[PATCH 1/1] vexpress_ca9x4: Enable use of correct DTB file and restore EFI loader.

Tom Rini trini at konsulko.com
Fri Mar 27 16:45:17 CET 2020


On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 08:18:32AM +0100, Kristian Amlie wrote:
> On 27/03/2020 06:44, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 3/27/20 2:39 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 06:22:16PM +0100, Kristian Amlie wrote:
> > > 
> > > > EFI was disabled in f95b8a4b5f64f because of the missing DTB file,
> > > > and indeed, the DTB file is required to load recent versions of GRUB
> > > > (2.04) correctly.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Kristian Amlie <kristian.amlie at northern.tech>
> > > 
> > > Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!
> > > 
> > 
> > Since this patch is merged I get errors on Gitlab for vexpress_ca9x4:
> > 
> > https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi/-/jobs/69269
> > 
> > Filename 'lib/efi_loader/helloworld.efi'.
> > Load address: 0x60000000
> > Loading: *#
> >       1.8 MiB/s
> > done
> > Bytes transferred = 1840 (730 hex)
> > smc911x: MAC 52:54:00:12:34:56
> > => => crc32 60000000 $filesize
> > CRC32 for 60000000 ... 6000072f ==> f5c77855
> > => => bootefi 60000000
> > 78Scanning disks on mmc...
> > Card did not respond to voltage select!
> > MMC Device 1 not found
> > MMC Device 2 not found
> > MMC Device 3 not found
> > Found 0 disks
> > ERROR: need device tree
> 
> Is the "bootefi 60000000" command correct? Doesn't "bootefi" need to be
> called with both an EFI binary address and a device tree address?

It is I believe what we do elsewhere.  I'm going to revert this for now
until it can be sorted out, sorry.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200327/a57adec6/attachment.sig>


More information about the U-Boot mailing list