[PATCH] arm: dtsi: sama5d2: Add uart4 definition to sama5d2.dtsi

[Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com]

On 07.05.2020 14:32, Tiaki Rice wrote:
> Eugen,
> 
> Thanks for the speedy reply, I did not know about this script! I must have glossed over it in the uboot patch documentation page.
> 
> The commit line is 82 characters which is longer than the preferred max of 75. Oops. Don't think this warning would be stopping the patch going through though...
> 

Hi,

For sure that won't be a problem with patchwork.
however , it looks like your patch is windows-generated ? That might be 
an issue, I do not know. Can you send me your patch as attachment file ?

Thanks

> 
> Here is the output for the patch:
> -----
>      $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-dtsi-sama5d2-Add-uart4-definition-to-sama5d2.dtsi.patch
>      WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
>      #7:
>      This patch adds support for uart4 to the processor level device tree include file.
> 
>      total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 14 lines checked
> 
>      NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
>            mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
> 
>      0001-dtsi-sama5d2-Add-uart4-definition-to-sama5d2.dtsi.patch has style problems, please review.
> 
>      NOTE: Ignored message types: COMPLEX_MACRO CONSIDER_KSTRTO MINMAX MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE NETWORKING_BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE PREFER_ETHER_ADDR_COPY USLEEP_RANGE
> 
>      NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
>            them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> -----
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tiaki Rice
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com <Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com>
> Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2020 8:19 PM
> To: tiakirice at hotmail.com
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dtsi: sama5d2: Add uart4 definition to sama5d2.dtsi
> 
> On 07.05.2020 12:21, Tiaki Rice wrote:
> 
>> Hello Eugen,
>>
>> I'm new to this whole mailing list patchwork thingy so I suspect I didn't quite submit the patch correctly, maybe you can point me in the right direction.
>>
>> What I did:
>> - Made the changes on master and locally commited them
>> - Created a patch using  'git format-patch' and modified the patch file email body.
>> - Used 'git send-email' to send the patch to u-boot at lists.denx.de and
>> Cc'd you
>>
>> This opened my Outlook of which I checked to make sure the email was plain text and then sent it. Any ideas?
>>
> 
> Hi Tiaki,
> 
>   From my perspective you did everything very well. The patch looks sent fine. I would only have one question, did you check your patch with the built-in perl script that automatically checks your patch for formatting ?
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict <your patch file>
> 
> About patchwork, I think it may be an issue with patchwork.
> 
> Eugen
> 
> 
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Tiaki Rice
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com <Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2020 7:12 PM
>> To: tiakirice at hotmail.com; u-boot at lists.denx.de
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: dtsi: sama5d2: Add uart4 definition to
>> sama5d2.dtsi
>>
>> On 07.05.2020 07:43, Tiaki Rice wrote:
>>> This patch adds support for uart4 to the processor level device tree include file.
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tiaki Rice <tiakirice at hotmail.com>
>>> Cc: Eugen Hristev <Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for contributing !
>>
>> I have an issue with this patch missing from patchwork.
>> Anyone has any idea why that happened ?
>>
>> Eugen
>>
>>>     arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>>     1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
>>> index 5adc47b906..6fb2cb25f9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/sama5d2.dtsi
>>> @@ -746,6 +746,14 @@
>>>     status = "disabled";
>>>     };
>>>
>>> +uart4: serial at fc00c000 {
>>> +compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-usart"; reg = <0xfc00c000 0x100>;
>>> +clocks = <&uart4_clk>; clock-names = "usart"; status = "disabled";
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>     i2c1: i2c at fc028000 {
>>>     compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-i2c";
>>>     reg = <0xfc028000 0x100>;
>>> --
>>> 2.22.0.windows.1
>>>
>>
>