[ANN] U-Boot v2020.07-rc2 released

[Tom Rini]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:52:26PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 5/13/20 4:49 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 08:13:45AM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >> Hello Heinrich,
> >>
> >> Am 13.05.2020 um 07:53 schrieb Heinrich Schuchardt:
> >>> On 5/13/20 5:54 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >>>> Hello Tom,
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 12.05.2020 um 15:28 schrieb Heiko Schocher:
> >>>>> Hello Tom,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 12.05.2020 um 00:28 schrieb Tom Rini:
> >>>>>> Hey all,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It's release day and I've tagged v2020.07-rc2.  At this point out we
> >>>>>> should be seeing stabilization, clean-up and localized new features.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Once again, for a changelog,
> >>>>>> git log --merges v2020.07-rc1..v2020.07-rc2
> >>>>>> and as always, I ask for more details in the PRs people send me so I can
> >>>>>> put them in the merge commit.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm planning to follow the every-other-week RC schedule and release on
> >>>>>> July 6th.  I'm also thinking about opening -next again on June 8th as
> >>>>>> that will give us a bit more time to focus on stability and regression
> >>>>>> fixing.  Thanks all!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> FYI:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have now running the following 4 boards in my daily automated tbot
> >>>>> testsetup (build and install U-boot on the boards, and run test.py)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> wandboard DL (imx6)
> >>>>> http://xeidos.ddns.net/ubtestresults/result/69
> >>>>>
> >>>>> socrates (mpc85xx)
> >>>>> http://xeidos.ddns.net/ubtestresults/result/70
> >>>>>
> >>>>> BBB (am335x)
> >>>>> http://xeidos.ddns.net/ubtestresults/result/71
> >>>>>
> >>>>> aristainetos2 (imx6) (with some patches on top, gpio fixes just posted
> >>>>> also on this board with secure boot enabled)
> >>>>> http://xeidos.ddns.net/ubtestresults/result/72
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hope I find time to get this up and running for some of my at91 boards
> >>>>
> >>>> May I am nerving with this stuff .. but today morning, I see for the
> >>>> wandboard with commit 10bca13ea6 the image size increased around ~35K
> >>>> compared to commit 2a38d2239
> >>>>
> >>>> http://xeidos.ddns.net/ubtestresults/stats/wandboard_defconfig/10
> >>>>
> >>>> bye,
> >>>> Heiko
> >>>
> >>> Hello Heiko,
> >>>
> >>> I am not able to reproduce your 35k increase. This is what I got:
> >>>
> >>> 10bca13ea6
> >>> 668860 u-boot-with-spl.imx
> >>> 599164 u-boot.bin
> >>>
> >>> 2a38d2239
> >>> 668780 u-boot-with-spl.imx
> >>> 599084 u-boot.bin
> >>>
> >>> 80 additional bytes seems to be in line with the few lines added to
> >>> drivers/gpio/gpio-uclass.c in 47bd533e9dd0 ("gpio: emulate open drain &
> >>> open source in dm_gpio_set_value()").
> >>>
> >>> I am building on Debian Buster with gcc (Debian 9.3.0-11) 9.3.0.
> >>>
> >>> Please, indicate the size of which file is shown in the caption of your
> >>> graphs.
> >>
> >> Yes, I add this, when I am back in the office!
> >>
> >>> Please, check if your distribution updated your build system between the
> >>> two builds.
> >>
> >> No, I use the same toolchain:
> >>
> >> http://xeidos.ddns.net/ubtestresults/result/75
> >> http://xeidos.ddns.net/ubtestresults/result/69
> >>
> >> Ah, yes my fault! I measured the size of u-boot.img now the size of
> >> u-boot.bin as I made some changes ...
> >>
> >> hs at lab-1:tbot  $ ls -al
> >> total 1292
> >> drwxrwxr-x. 2 hs hs   4096 Apr 17 09:29 .
> >> drwxrwxr-x. 3 hs hs   4096 Apr 17 09:28 ..
> >> -rw-rw-rw-. 1 hs hs  48128 May 13 04:00 SPL
> >> -rw-rw-rw-. 1 hs hs  84476 May 13 04:00 System.map
> >> -rw-rw-rw-. 1 hs hs 597544 May 13 04:00 u-boot.bin
> >> -rw-rw-rw-. 1 hs hs  15553 May 13 04:00 u-boot.cfg
> >> -rw-rw-rw-. 1 hs hs 562116 May 13 04:00 u-boot.img
> >>
> >> So, sorry for the noise! I add to the database now also the name
> >> of the image.
> > 
> > I'm glad you got this sorted out but I would _really_ encourage you to
> > make use of the size tracking information we have had in buildman for
> > forever to track the function size changes, when you build for commit A
> > and B.  This is what I do for every PR, FWIW.
> 
> Do we now reflect on that growth in any way ?

For the past several years, yes.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20200513/ab0b99fc/attachment.sig>