[PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL

[Pragnesh Patel]

Hi Bin,

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>Sent: 20 May 2020 13:07
>To: Pragnesh Patel <pragnesh.patel at sifive.com>
>Cc: Rick Chen <rickchen36 at gmail.com>; Jagan Teki
><jagan at amarulasolutions.com>; Sean Anderson <seanga2 at gmail.com>; U-
>Boot Mailing List <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; rick <rick at andestech.com>; Alan
>Kao <alankao at andestech.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL
>
>[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you recognize the
>sender and know the content is safe
>
>"Hi Pragnesh,
>
>On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 3:29 PM Pragnesh Patel
><pragnesh.patel at sifive.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Rick Chen <rickchen36 at gmail.com>
>> >Sent: 20 May 2020 08:38
>> >To: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>; Pragnesh Patel
>> ><pragnesh.patel at sifive.com>; Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>;
>> >Sean Anderson <seanga2 at gmail.com>
>> >Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; rick
>> ><rick at andestech.com>; Alan Kao <alankao at andestech.com>
>> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL
>> >
>> >[External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you
>> >recognize the sender and know the content is safe
>> >
>> >Hi Bin
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Bin Meng [mailto:bmeng.cn at gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 4:44 PM
>> >> To: Pragnesh Patel; Rick Jian-Zhi Chen(陳建志)
>> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/18] RISC-V SiFive FU540 support SPL
>> >>
>> >> Hi Rick,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 3:04 PM Pragnesh Patel
>> ><pragnesh.patel at sifive.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > This series add support for SPL to FU540. U-Boot SPL can boot
>> >> > from
>> >> > L2 LIM (0x0800_0000) and jump to OpenSBI(FW_DYNAMIC firmware)
>and
>> >> > U-Boot proper from MMC devices.
>> >> >
>> >> > This series depends on:
>> >> > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281853
>> >> > [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281852
>> >> >
>> >> > All these together is available for testing here [3] [3]
>> >> > https://github.com/pragnesh26992/u-boot/tree/spl
>> >> >
>> >> > How to test this patch:
>> >> > 1) Go to OpenSBI-dir : make PLATFORM=generic FW_DYNAMIC=y
>> >> > 2) export
>> >> >
>>
>>OPENSBI=<path/to/opensbi/build/platform/generic/firmware/fw_dynamic.
>> >> > bi
>> >> > n>
>> >> > 3) Change to u-boot-dir
>> >> > 4) make sifive_fu540_defconfig
>> >> > 5) make all
>> >> > 6) Format the SD card (make sure the disk has GPT, otherwise use
>> >> > gdisk to switch)
>> >> >
>> >> >         # sudo sgdisk --clear \
>> >> >         > --set-alignment=2 \
>> >> >         > --new=1:34:2081 --change-name=1:loader1
>> >> > --typecode=1:5B193300-
>> >FC78-40CD-8002-E86C45580B47 \
>> >> >         > --new=2:2082:10273 --change-name=2:loader2 --
>> >typecode=2:2E54B353-1271-4842-806F-E436D6AF6985 \
>> >> >         > --new=3:10274: --change-name=3:rootfs
>> >> > --typecode=3:0FC63DAF-
>> >8483-4772-8E79-3D69D8477DE4 \
>> >> >         > /dev/sda
>> >> >
>> >> > 7) sudo dd if=spl/u-boot-spl.bin of=/dev/sda seek=34
>> >> > 8) sudo dd if=u-boot.itb of=/dev/sda seek=2082
>> >> >
>> >> > Changes in v11:
>> >> > - Remove TPL related code and OF_PLATDATA from FU540
>> >> >   DDR driver (drivers/ram/sifive/fu540_ddr.c)
>> >> > - Update FU540 doc (doc/board/sifive/fu540.rst)
>> >> >   Remove unnecessary print
>> >>
>> >> Could we get this v11 applied as soon as possible for v2020.07?
>> >
>> >No problem, if everything is OK, I will applied ASAP.
>> >But Jagan seem have some responses, please check about it.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> > This series depends on:
>> >> > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281853
>> >> > [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1281852
>>
>> With " assigned-clocks" and " assigned-clock-rates" for cpus, this
>> FU540 SPL series is no more depend on the above patches.
>>
>> cpus {
>>                 assigned-clocks = <&prci PRCI_CLK_COREPLL>;
>>                 assigned-clock-rates = <1000000000>; .....
>> }
>>
>> I will update the series dependency in v12. Thanks to @Sean Anderson for
>the suggestion.
>>
>
>Are these "assigned-clocks" and "assigned-clock-rates" bindings the
>suggested ones by the Linux kernel upstream?

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200502100628.24809-17-pragnesh.patel@sifive.com/

>
>Regards,
>Bin