[RFC PATCH] mtd: spi: Drop redundent SPI flash driver

Jagan Teki jagan at amarulasolutions.com
Mon May 25 19:31:52 CEST 2020


On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 10:34 PM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 07:19, Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > UCLASS_SPI_FLASH driver at driver/mtd/spi is a generic
> > spi flash driver to probe jedec,spi-nor flash chips.
> >
> > Technically a probe call in U_BOOT_DRIVER is local to that
> > driver and not applicable to use it another driver or in
> > another code.
> >
> > The apollolake SPL code using the generic probe by adding
> > extra SPI flash driver, which make more confusion in terms
> > of code readability and driver model structure.
> >
> > The fact that apollolake SPL requires a separate SPI flash
> > driver to handle of-platdata via bind call, so move the
> > bind call in the generic flash driver and drop the driver
> > from apollolake code.
> >
> > I hope this wouldn't break generic code usage flash chips
> > otherwise, we can handle this via driver data or a separate
> > spi driver in drivers/mtd/spi.
> >
> > Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
> > Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr at ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/cpu/apollolake/spl.c | 60 -----------------------------------
> >  drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c    | 29 ++++++++++++++++-
> >  include/spi_flash.h           | 12 -------
> >  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
> Unfortunately this stops TPL from booting.
>
> Could you expose the 'read' method properly, perhaps?

Not sure why it requires, read call seems very much similar to sf isn't it?

Jagan.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list