[PATCH v1] x86: acpi: Drop _HID() where enumerated by _ADR()

Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Tue May 26 20:19:49 CEST 2020


ACPICA complains that either _HID() or _ADR() should be used.
For General Purpose DMA we may not drop the _ADR() because
the device is enumerated by PCI. Thus, simple drop _HID().

Reported-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl b/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl
index eaf75c8c673d..01077293bb91 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl
@@ -531,7 +531,6 @@ Device (PCI0)
     Device (GDMA)
     {
         Name (_ADR, 0x00150000)
-        Name (_HID, "808611A2")
         Name (_UID, Zero)
 
         Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized)
-- 
2.26.2



More information about the U-Boot mailing list