[PATCH 20/26] arm: mach-k3: do board config for PM and RM only if supported

[Lokesh Vutla]

On 10/11/20 2:35 pm, Tero Kristo wrote:
> If the raw PM support is built in, we are operating in the split
> firmware approach mode where RM and PM support is not available. In this
> case, skip the board config for these two.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-k3/sysfw-loader.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-k3/sysfw-loader.c b/arch/arm/mach-k3/sysfw-loader.c
> index 78c158c63f..154d2df049 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-k3/sysfw-loader.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-k3/sysfw-loader.c
> @@ -158,11 +158,13 @@ static void k3_sysfw_configure_using_fit(void *fit,
>  		      ret);
>  
>  	/* Apply power/clock (PM) specific configuration to SYSFW */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CLK_TI_SCI

IMHO, using CONFIG_CLK_TI_SCI is hack here. Can we showhow derive this
information based on the images loaded in FIT?

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh

>  	ret = board_ops->board_config_pm(ti_sci,
>  					 (u64)(u32)cfg_fragment_addr,
>  					 (u32)cfg_fragment_size);
>  	if (ret)
>  		panic("Failed to set board PM configuration (%d)\n", ret);
> +#endif
>  
>  	/* Extract resource management (RM) specific configuration from FIT */
>  	ret = fit_get_data_by_name(fit, images, SYSFW_CFG_RM,
> @@ -171,12 +173,14 @@ static void k3_sysfw_configure_using_fit(void *fit,
>  		panic("Error accessing %s node in FIT (%d)\n", SYSFW_CFG_RM,
>  		      ret);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CLK_TI_SCI
>  	/* Apply resource management (RM) configuration to SYSFW */
>  	ret = board_ops->board_config_rm(ti_sci,
>  					 (u64)(u32)cfg_fragment_addr,
>  					 (u32)cfg_fragment_size);
>  	if (ret)
>  		panic("Failed to set board RM configuration (%d)\n", ret);
> +#endif
>  
>  	/* Extract security specific configuration from FIT */
>  	ret = fit_get_data_by_name(fit, images, SYSFW_CFG_SEC,
>