[PATCH 10/10] arm64: versal: Set initrd_high to as high as possible
Michal Simek
michal.simek at xilinx.com
Fri Oct 23 07:43:43 CEST 2020
On 22. 10. 20 19:45, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 12:32:22PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
>
>> From: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu
>> <siva.durga.paladugu at xilinx.com>
>>
>> This patch is setting up the initrd_high to as high as possible
>> by leaving max stack size for u-boot so that bigger rootfs can
>> also be loaded by u-boot for booting kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu
>> <siva.durga.paladugu at xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek
>> <michal.simek at xilinx.com> ---
>>
>> board/xilinx/versal/board.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4
>> insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/board/xilinx/versal/board.c
>> b/board/xilinx/versal/board.c index 912c1143a8ad..09229e0a75a4
>> 100644 --- a/board/xilinx/versal/board.c +++
>> b/board/xilinx/versal/board.c @@ -217,6 +217,10 @@ int
>> board_late_init(void)
>>
>> env_set("boot_targets", new_targets);
>>
>> + initrd_hi = gd->start_addr_sp - CONFIG_STACK_SIZE; + initrd_hi
>> = round_down(initrd_hi, SZ_16M); + env_set_addr("initrd_high",
>> (void *)initrd_hi); + return board_late_init_xilinx(); }
>
> My concern here (and also microblaze-generic, after some grepping)
> is that wouldn't it be best to set bootm_size and let fdt and
> initrd be relocated as needed?
You are right and I have already done it in this way but forget to
remove this patch from my queue. Will drop this patch.
Thanks,
Michal
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list