[maemo-leste] [PATCH] nokia_rx51: disable obsolete VIDEO config

Pali Rohár pali at kernel.org
Fri Oct 30 20:09:53 CET 2020


On Thursday 29 October 2020 14:06:30 Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> On 24/10/20 5:49 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:46:45PM +0200, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 24/10/2020 12:06, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 21 October 2020 08:47:02 Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:08:37AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >>>>> On Tuesday 20 October 2020 10:17:07 Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 11:30:51AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> <snip>
> >>>>> Yes, there is mmc issue, I have found which commit caused it and
> >>>>> because nobody was able to debug / understand what is happening I have
> >>>>> sent revert patch, which fixes that issue, until somebody solve issue in
> >>>>> original patch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But I do not see any progress on either applying revert patch or fixing
> >>>>> original patch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> And I do not like to have custom patch in my local branch (and
> >>>>> periodically rebasing it) as it just another layer of complication.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could we move somehow in this issue?
> >>>>
> >>>> No, it's probably stuck until you can fix the problem or otherwise add a
> >>>> "quirk" for your platform.  What does Linux do in this case?
> >>>
> >>> Well, I provided all requested information, just I'm lacking any new
> >>> response from developers / maintainers of particular code.
> >>>
> >>> I have already identified problematic place / commit and I have already
> >>> sent revert patch which fixing this issue.
> >>>
> >>> Tom, what else do you need?
> >>>
> >>> I see the main issue now that nobody reviewed / merged patch and nobody
> >>> responded to emails which I have sent more then 2 months ago.
> >>
> >> I would like to add my voice for reverting the patches that break the
> >> support, and work from that point to improve support and eventually
> >> migrate to DT.
> >>
> >> Maemo Leste has a lot of Nokia N900 users, and this is blocking us from
> >> moving to mainline u-boot. Is it possible to get the opinion of the
> >> original patch authors on this?
> >>
> >> I am set up with a serial module on the Nokia N900, so I can help
> >> provide specific debug info.
> > 
> > Let me add in the TI folks that might be able to look in to any of this
> > today.  But the next problem is that the rx51 needs to be converted to
> > use DM in U-Boot.  It's throwing up a ton of "you need to convert to X
> > by <some release in 2019> or this board may be removed" warnings at
> > build.  I really really want to see some of this start to be addressed.
> 
> 
> IIUC, the breakage is happening in non-DM code.

No, this code is not non-DM specific. It is used also for DM builds.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list