[PATCH] binman: Allow FIT binaries to have missing external blobs

[Simon Glass]

Hi Alper,

On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 04:35, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> At present if a FIT references a missing external blob, binman reports an
> error, even if the image is supposed to allow this.
>
> Propagate this setting down to the child sections of the FIT, so that the
> behaviour is consistent.
>
> This is a fix-up patch to:
>
>    binman: Build FIT image subentries with the section etype
>
> and will be squashed into that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> ---
>
>  tools/binman/etype/fit.py                  | 15 ++++++++
>  tools/binman/ftest.py                      |  8 +++++
>  tools/binman/test/168_fit_missing_blob.dts | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/binman/test/168_fit_missing_blob.dts

I found that evb-rk3288 fails to build with the final patch from your
series. See u-boot-dm/testing for the tree.

Regards,
Simon