[PATCH v2] armv8: layerscape: don't remove crypto node if just partially disabled

[Iuliana Prodan]

Michael Walle-2 wrote
> On all newer Layerscape SoCs, the crypto module is just partially
> disabled on non-E parts. Thus it doesn't make sense to completely remove
> the node. Linux will figure out what is there and what is not.
> 
> Just remove it for older SoCs, where the module is indeed completely
> disabled on non-E parts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <

> michael@

> >
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>  - properly filter on SoC. Thanks to Horia's mail. See
>    https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/

> 20200602150904.1997-1-michael@

> /#2457448
> 
>  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
> index 3b43afb25c..acd25d4825 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/fdt.c
> @@ -437,13 +437,48 @@ __weak void fdt_fixup_ecam(void *blob)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +/*
> + * If it is a non-E part the crypto is disabled on the following SoCs:
> + *  - LS1043A
> + *  - LS1088A
> + *  - LS2088A
> + * and their personalities.
> + *
> + * On all other SoC they are just partially disabled, that means that the
> + * following is still working:
> + *  - hashing (using MDHA - message digest hash accelerator)
> + *  - random number generation (using RNG4)
> + *  - cyclic redundancy checking (using CRCA)
> + *  - runtime integrity checker (RTIC)
> + *
> + * The linux driver will figure out what is available and what is not.
> + * Therefore, we just remove the crypto node on the SoCs which has no
> crypto
> + * support at all.
> + */
> +static bool crypto_is_disabled(unsigned int svr)
> +{
> +	if (IS_E_PROCESSOR(svr))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (IS_SVR_DEV(svr, SVR_DEV(SVR_LS1043A)))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (IS_SVR_DEV(svr, SVR_DEV(SVR_LS1088A)))
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (IS_SVR_DEV(svr, SVR_DEV(SVR_LS2088A)))
> +		return true;
> +
> 
> These ifs can be put into a switch like
> 	switch (SVR_SOC_VER(svr)) {
> 	case SVR_LS1043A:
> 	case SVR_LS1088A:
> 	case SVR_LS2088A:
> 		return true;
>        }
> 
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  void ft_cpu_setup(void *blob, struct bd_info *bd)
>  {
>  	struct ccsr_gur __iomem *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_GUTS_ADDR);
>  	unsigned int svr = gur_in32(&gur->svr);
>  
>  	/* delete crypto node if not on an E-processor */
> -	if (!IS_E_PROCESSOR(svr))
> +	if (crypto_is_disabled(svr))
>  		fdt_fixup_crypto_node(blob, 0);
>  #if CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SEC_COMPAT >= 4
>  	else {
> -- 
> 2.20.1





--
Sent from: http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/