[PATCH 1/2] spl: Use standard FIT entries

[Michal Simek]

SPL is creating fit-images DT node when loadables are recorded in selected
configuration. Entries which are created are using entry-point and
load-addr property names. But there shouldn't be a need to use non standard
properties because entry/load are standard FIT properties. But using
standard FIT properties enables option to use generic FIT functions to
descrease SPL size. Here is result for ZynqMP virt configuration:
xilinx_zynqmp_virt: spl/u-boot-spl:all -82 spl/u-boot-spl:rodata -22 spl/u-boot-spl:text -60

The patch causes change in run time fit image record.
Before:
fit-images {
        uboot {
                os = "u-boot";
                type = "firmware";
                size = <0xfd520>;
                entry-point = <0x8000000>;
                load-addr = <0x8000000>;
        };
};

After:
fit-images {
        uboot {
                os = "u-boot";
                type = "firmware";
                size = <0xfd520>;
                entry = <0x8000000>;
                load = <0x8000000>;
        };
};

Replacing calling fdt_getprop_u32() by fit_image_get_entry/load() also
enables support for reading entry/load properties recorded in 64bit format.

Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
---

Would be good to know history of fit-images and it's property names but
there shouldn't be a need to use non standard names where we have
FIT_*_PROP recorded as macros in include/image.h.

Concern regarding backward compatibility is definitely valid but not sure
how many systems can be affected by this change.

Adding temporary support for entry-point/load-addr is also possible.
Or second way around is to create new wrappers as
fit_image_get_entry_point()/fit_image_get_load_addr() or
call fit_image_get_address() directly.

---
 common/fdt_support.c | 4 ++--
 common/spl/spl_atf.c | 7 ++++---
 common/spl/spl_fit.c | 6 +++++-
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c
index a565b470f81e..b8a8768a2147 100644
--- a/common/fdt_support.c
+++ b/common/fdt_support.c
@@ -616,9 +616,9 @@ int fdt_record_loadable(void *blob, u32 index, const char *name,
 	 * However, spl_fit.c is not 64bit safe either: i.e. we should not
 	 * have an issue here.
 	 */
-	fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "load-addr", load_addr);
+	fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "load", load_addr);
 	if (entry_point != -1)
-		fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "entry-point", entry_point);
+		fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "entry", entry_point);
 	fdt_setprop_u32(blob, node, "size", size);
 	if (type)
 		fdt_setprop_string(blob, node, "type", type);
diff --git a/common/spl/spl_atf.c b/common/spl/spl_atf.c
index b54b4f0d22e2..9bd25f6b32c1 100644
--- a/common/spl/spl_atf.c
+++ b/common/spl/spl_atf.c
@@ -132,10 +132,11 @@ static int spl_fit_images_find(void *blob, int os)
 uintptr_t spl_fit_images_get_entry(void *blob, int node)
 {
 	ulong  val;
+	int ret;
 
-	val = fdt_getprop_u32(blob, node, "entry-point");
-	if (val == FDT_ERROR)
-		val = fdt_getprop_u32(blob, node, "load-addr");
+	ret = fit_image_get_entry(blob, node, &val);
+	if (ret)
+		ret = fit_image_get_load(blob, node, &val);
 
 	debug("%s: entry point 0x%lx\n", __func__, val);
 	return val;
diff --git a/common/spl/spl_fit.c b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
index 365104fe0288..b69b3948841f 100644
--- a/common/spl/spl_fit.c
+++ b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
@@ -332,9 +332,13 @@ static int spl_load_fit_image(struct spl_load_info *info, ulong sector,
 	}
 
 	if (image_info) {
+		ulong entry_point;
+
 		image_info->load_addr = load_addr;
 		image_info->size = length;
-		image_info->entry_point = fdt_getprop_u32(fit, node, "entry");
+
+		if (!fit_image_get_entry(fit, node, &entry_point))
+			image_info->entry_point = entry_point;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.28.0