[PATCH v3 9/9] usb: xhci: convert to readx_poll_sleep_timeout()

[Marek Vasut]

On 9/9/20 3:46 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 7:05 PM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/9/20 3:55 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:15 AM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/8/20 5:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 7:13 PM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/8/20 3:44 AM, Bin Meng wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 3:14 PM Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun at mediatek.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Use readx_poll_sleep_timeout() to poll the register status
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun at mediatek.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> v3: no changes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> v2: fix typo of title suggested by Frank
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>  drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
>>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks. So now I have half of a RESEND patchset with RB tags, and
>>>>>> another half of just RB tags without patchset. Can someone of you please
>>>>>> collect the tags and resend the patchset once more with the collected
>>>>>> tags, so it's all in one place ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe the latest version has all the RB tags.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you, I cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox,
>>>> because the original patches are just not there.
>>>
>>> You can use patchwork to help the custodian work. I found it very
>>> helpful to download the patches from patchwork and apply.
>>
>> Can you also comment on patches via patchwork ?
>>
>> I mean, really, can we please just stick to the usual workflow ? That's
>> all I am asking for , nothing else, nothing new.
> 
> I don't understand the question about "usual workflow". You asked "I
> cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox" and I
> recommended patchwork which will satisfy the requirement of what you
> asked.

Right, I can, but if there is more I want to say about the patch, I
cannot do it with patchwork. Then I need the patch, which I don't have.
Hence my remark about the usual email-based workflow.