[PATCH 0/5] edison: Support for writing an xFSTK image

[Simon Glass]

Hi Bin,

On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 21:27, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 11:22 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:04 AM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bin,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 01:11, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Simon,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 9:28 AM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > At present it is painful to put Edison in a hardware lab because it has
> > > > > two separate recovery modes. When the board has a functioning U-Boot, DFU
> > > > > can be used. Otherwise an xFSTK image must be used.
> > > > >
> > > > > This series converts Andy's script to a binman description so that U-Boot
> > > > > can produce an xFSTK image directly.
> > > > >
> > > > > With this, I can put an Edison in my lab fairly easily.
> > > > >
> > > > > The series is available at u-boot-dm/edison-working and is based on the
> > > > > reset binman series for sunxi.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://gist.github.com/andy-shev/2c388310f2773ead647d9c1a3f1c813f
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This series does not apply on u-boot-x86/next.
> > > >
> > > > Is this due to "the reset binman series for sunxi" not applied yet?
> > >
> > > Yes. It's in dm/next but I'll send a pull request upstream.
> >
> > Series applied to u-boot-x86/next, thanks!
>
> This seems to break the build.
>
> Could you please help look at it?
> https://dev.azure.com/bmeng/GitHub/_build/results?buildId=295&view=results

OK yes it looks like I dropped a patch perhaps. I'll send a fix-up.

Regards,
Simon