[PATCH 0/3] add "call" command

Heinrich Schuchardt xypron.glpk at gmx.de
Sat Sep 26 12:39:35 CEST 2020


On 9/26/20 10:51 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Heinrich,
>
> In message <99821acf-b921-2c06-05b8-dd32058f28f2 at gmx.de> you wrote:
>>
>> For me this could be realized by enhancing the run command to allow:
>>
>> run varname1 varname2 ... varnameN --args argv1 argv2 argv3
>>
>> Arguments argv1, argv2, ... are passed to the script identified by the
>> last variable (varnameN).
>
> Nice idea!  Only we should do a better syntax (options preceeding
> argument), i. e.
>
> 	run [ --args argv ] varname1 varname2 ...
>
> where argv would be the name of a variale to hold the arguments (as
> a comma (?) separated list) ?
In another mail you suggested "run arg1 arg2 ... -- varname1 varname2".

Whether arguments or script names are first or last does not make much
of a difference for the implementation effort. Any way you have to loop
over all arguments to find the separator "--".

"better syntax" does not apply here as the two alternatives have the
same expressivity, and need the same amount of typing and learning. It
is a matter of taste.

>
> Do you have an idea how the "script" would pull out the arguments
> from that variable?

Rasmus already suggested $1 .. $9 for the positional arguments (where
counting should not stop at 9).

Best regards

Heinrich

>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>



More information about the U-Boot mailing list