[PATCH v1 1/2] cmd: bind: Fix driver binding on a device

Sean Anderson seanga2 at gmail.com
Fri Apr 9 15:13:12 CEST 2021


On 4/9/21 8:05 AM, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/9/21 1:01 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 1:32 PM Patrice CHOTARD
>> <patrice.chotard at foss.st.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/9/21 11:48 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 12:28 PM Patrice CHOTARD
>>>> <patrice.chotard at foss.st.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 4/9/21 11:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 10:37 AM Patrice Chotard
>>>>>> <patrice.chotard at foss.st.com> wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>>>>> +                       if (drv) {
>>>>>>> +                               if (drv == entry)
>>>>>>> +                                       break;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +                       } else {
>>>>>>> +                               if (!ret)
>>>>>>> +                                       break;
>>>>>>> +                       }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This can be simplified to
>>>>>> } else if (!ret)
>>>>>>    break;
>>>>>
>>>>> I know but checkpatch.pl requested it ;-)
>>>>
>>>> You mean it doesn't recognize 'else if' construction? Then it's a bug
>>>> there for sure.
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, i mean checkpath.pl request to put {} on all statements as shown below :
>>>
>>> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-cmd-bind-Fix-driver-binding-on-a-device.patch
>>> CHECK: braces {} should be used on all arms of this statement
>>> #83: FILE: drivers/core/lists.c:228:
>>> +                       if (drv) {
>>> [...]
>>> +                       } else if (!ret)
>>
>> So, you still can put else and if on one line, right?
>>
> 
> No, if i put else and if on one line as you suggested, checkpatch.pl is complaining as shown above.
> 
> Patrice
> 

} else if (!ret) {
	break;
}

?


More information about the U-Boot mailing list