[PATCH 11/13] board: synquacer: Add DeveloperBox 96boards EE support

[Takahiro Akashi]

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 03:29:23PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Takahiro,
> 
> 2021年4月14日(水) 13:48 Takahiro Akashi <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>:
> >
> > > > So why not define UEFI load options (BOOTxxxx) and use UEFI boot manager
> > > > ("bootefi bootmgr")?
> > > > That is the way how UEFI (at least boot manager) boots the kernel.
> > >
> > > Good point! Actually, I'm not sure how to define the BOOTxxxx in
> > > config.h (I only
> > > know how to include efivars file when build). Could you tell me how to do it?
> > > I would like to rewrite the default boot commands.
> >
> > For example,
> > => efidebug boot add 1 USBBOOT usb 0:1 /EFI/BOOT/bootaa64.efi <boot args>
> > => efidebug boot add 2 MMCBOOT mmc 0:1 /EFI/BOOT/bootaa64.efi <boot args>
> > => efidebug boot order 1 2
> > => bootefi bootmgr
> 
> Hmm, but this can not be embedded in the build process, can this?

Probably there are a couple of ways;
You may put them in "pre_boot_environment_command" if you don't mind :)

But it would be best to run them as part of OS installation process.
Or you may want to provide a default efivars file(?).

> >
> > Since "BOOTxxx" are non-volatile variables, we don't have to
> > set them again once those commands are run.
> 
> What is the default behavior of "bootefi bootmgr" if there is no
> BOOTxxxx is set?

Nothing will happen.

> If it just do nothing and exit, I think I can add it to the top of
> CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND
> so that U-Boot can try it first.
> (BOOTxxxx will be set by user after boot)
> 
> > But distro_bootcmd can also detect and try to boot "bootaa64.efi" anyway.
> > (I'm not sure about the order of devices to detect though.)
> 
> Hmm, interesting. OK, I'll try to enable distro_bootcmd.

I'm pretty sure it will work.

-Takahiro Akashi

> Thank you,
> 
> >
> > -Takahiro Akashi
> >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Masami Hiramatsu
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Masami Hiramatsu