[PATCH v2 03/17] drivers: reset: Handle gracefully NULL pointers
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Wed Apr 14 21:38:30 CEST 2021
Hi Kishon,
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 11:28, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com> wrote:
>
> From: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot at ti.com>
>
> The reset framework provides devm_reset_control_get_optional()
> which can return NULL (not an error case). So all the other reset_ops
> should handle NULL gracefully. Prepare the way for a managed reset
> API by handling NULL pointers without crashing nor failing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/reset/reset-uclass.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-uclass.c b/drivers/reset/reset-uclass.c
> index 071c389ca0..98304bc0ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-uclass.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-uclass.c
> @@ -13,9 +13,12 @@
> #include <dm/devres.h>
> #include <dm/lists.h>
>
> -static inline struct reset_ops *reset_dev_ops(struct udevice *dev)
> +struct reset_ops nop_reset_ops = {
> +};
> +
> +static inline struct reset_ops *reset_dev_ops(struct reset_ctl *r)
> {
> - return (struct reset_ops *)dev->driver->ops;
> + return r ? (struct reset_ops *)r->dev->driver->ops : &nop_reset_ops;
This behaviour still seems odd to me. Why do you have a reset driver
with no ops? That is not allowed.
> }
>
> static int reset_of_xlate_default(struct reset_ctl *reset_ctl,
> @@ -54,9 +57,10 @@ static int reset_get_by_index_tail(int ret, ofnode node,
> debug("%s %d\n", ofnode_get_name(args->node), args->args[0]);
> return ret;
> }
> - ops = reset_dev_ops(dev_reset);
>
> reset_ctl->dev = dev_reset;
> + ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl);
> +
> if (ops->of_xlate)
> ret = ops->of_xlate(reset_ctl, args);
> else
> @@ -162,29 +166,29 @@ int reset_get_by_name(struct udevice *dev, const char *name,
>
> int reset_request(struct reset_ctl *reset_ctl)
> {
> - struct reset_ops *ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl->dev);
> + struct reset_ops *ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl);
>
> debug("%s(reset_ctl=%p)\n", __func__, reset_ctl);
>
> - return ops->request(reset_ctl);
> + return ops->request ? ops->request(reset_ctl) : 0;
Can you check this first and return -ENOSYS ? E.g.
if (!ops->request)
return -ENOSYS;
return ops->request(reset_ctl);
Same below
> }
>
> int reset_free(struct reset_ctl *reset_ctl)
> {
> - struct reset_ops *ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl->dev);
> + struct reset_ops *ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl);
>
> debug("%s(reset_ctl=%p)\n", __func__, reset_ctl);
>
> - return ops->rfree(reset_ctl);
> + return ops->rfree ? ops->rfree(reset_ctl) : 0;
> }
>
> int reset_assert(struct reset_ctl *reset_ctl)
> {
> - struct reset_ops *ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl->dev);
> + struct reset_ops *ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl);
>
> debug("%s(reset_ctl=%p)\n", __func__, reset_ctl);
>
> - return ops->rst_assert(reset_ctl);
> + return ops->rst_assert ? ops->rst_assert(reset_ctl) : 0;
> }
>
> int reset_assert_bulk(struct reset_ctl_bulk *bulk)
> @@ -202,11 +206,11 @@ int reset_assert_bulk(struct reset_ctl_bulk *bulk)
>
> int reset_deassert(struct reset_ctl *reset_ctl)
> {
> - struct reset_ops *ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl->dev);
> + struct reset_ops *ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl);
>
> debug("%s(reset_ctl=%p)\n", __func__, reset_ctl);
>
> - return ops->rst_deassert(reset_ctl);
> + return ops->rst_deassert ? ops->rst_deassert(reset_ctl) : 0;
> }
>
> int reset_deassert_bulk(struct reset_ctl_bulk *bulk)
> @@ -224,11 +228,11 @@ int reset_deassert_bulk(struct reset_ctl_bulk *bulk)
>
> int reset_status(struct reset_ctl *reset_ctl)
> {
> - struct reset_ops *ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl->dev);
> + struct reset_ops *ops = reset_dev_ops(reset_ctl);
>
> debug("%s(reset_ctl=%p)\n", __func__, reset_ctl);
>
> - return ops->rst_status(reset_ctl);
> + return ops->rst_status ? ops->rst_status(reset_ctl) : 0;
> }
>
> int reset_release_all(struct reset_ctl *reset_ctl, int count)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Regards,
Simon
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list