[PATCH 7/7] x86: fsp: Only FSP2 has INIT_PHASE_END_FIRMWARE
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Mon Aug 2 04:53:32 CEST 2021
Hi Simon,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 3:19 AM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Bin,
>
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 at 02:45, Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > For FSP1, there is no such INIT_PHASE_END_FIRMWARE.
> >
> > Fixes: 7c73cea44290 ("x86: Notify the FSP of the 'end firmware' event")
> > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_common.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_common.c b/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_common.c
> > index 6365b0a50a..0155eaee8d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_common.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/lib/fsp/fsp_common.c
> > @@ -68,13 +68,15 @@ void board_final_cleanup(void)
> > /* TODO(sjg at chromium.org): This causes Linux to crash */
> > return;
> >
> > - /* call into FspNotify */
> > - debug("Calling into FSP (notify phase INIT_PHASE_END_FIRMWARE): ");
> > - status = fsp_notify(NULL, INIT_PHASE_END_FIRMWARE);
> > - if (status)
> > - debug("fail, error code %x\n", status);
> > - else
> > - debug("OK\n");
> > + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(FSP_VERSION2)) {
> > + /* call into FspNotify */
> > + debug("Calling into FSP (notify phase INIT_PHASE_END_FIRMWARE): ");
> > + status = fsp_notify(NULL, INIT_PHASE_END_FIRMWARE);
> > + if (status)
> > + debug("fail, error code %x\n", status);
> > + else
> > + debug("OK\n");
> > + }
> > }
>
> So shouldn't we move this whole function into fsp2?
Yes, I think so.
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list