[PATCH v3 1/2] imx8mm-evk: Generate a single bootable flash.bin again
Marcel Ziswiler
marcel.ziswiler at toradex.com
Mon Aug 23 13:54:11 CEST 2021
Hi Fabio
On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 08:27 -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Heiko Thiery and Marcel,
>
> On 19/08/2021 16:28, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
> > index f200afac9f..75cd59e545 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-evk-u-boot.dtsi
> > @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@
> > };
> >
> >
> > - flash {
> > + spl {
> > mkimage {
> > args = "-n spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout -T imx8mimage -e 0x7e1000";
> >
> > @@ -217,4 +217,19 @@
> > };
> > };
> > };
> > +
> > + imx-boot {
> > + filename = "flash.bin";
> > + pad-byte = <0x00>;
> > +
> > + spl: blob-ext at 1 {
> > + offset = <0x0>;
> > + filename = "spl.bin";
> > + };
> > +
> > + uboot: blob-ext at 2 {
> > + offset = <0x57c00>;
> > + filename = "u-boot.itb";
> > + };
> > + };
> > };
>
> Do we have a consensus on the binman format to generate a monolithic
> flash.bin?
Yes, I would say so. Remember, I did include this already in our latest verdin-imx8mm specific patch set
together with its migration to using binman [1].
> I understand that patch 2/2 still needs to be improved, but what about
> this one?
Yes, I agree.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler at toradex.com>
[1] https://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=162949278629882
> Thanks,
>
> Fabio Estevam
Cheers
Marcel
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list