[PATCH 13/14] lmb: Mark arch_lmb_reserve() as weak symbol

[Marek Vasut]

On 8/15/21 9:50 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 08:13:13PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> 
>> Mark arch_lmb_reserve() weak on architecture level, so it can be
>> overridden if necessary. This might be necessary if there is some
>> sort of architectural exception where e.g. more LMB areas have to
>> be reserved.
>>
>> Note that sandbox now needs an empty implementation of
>> arch_lmb_reserve().
> 
> I'm not sure we need this.  We have the arch and board call-outs, and
> I've already addressed the imx example.  I really want to see how this
> works on the I believe you've said rcar example.

Since they disable relocation in the bsp too, gd->ram_top would be 
replaced by fixed value there. I can skip this patch for now.