[PATCH] board/imx6sabresd: add the option of imx6solo during FIT matching

Fabio Estevam festevam at gmail.com
Mon Aug 30 16:14:51 CEST 2021


On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 10:20 AM jiladahe1997 at gmail.com
<jiladahe1997 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From 934d43a647bfee33f32f710500c75ef2490f25f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mingrui Ren <jiladahe1997 at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:35:11 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] board/imx6sabresd: add imx6solo during FIT matching
>
> When using imx6solo cpu, the 'board_fit_config_name_match' function
> will return -1, then u-boot will choose wrong FIT, and causing further
> problems.
>
> imx6solo is similar to imx6dl, so I just add it into imx6dl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mingrui Ren <jiladahe1997 at gmail.com>
> ---
>  board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c b/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c
> index 8c35230855..0bd968411e 100644
> --- a/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c
> +++ b/board/freescale/mx6sabresd/mx6sabresd.c
> @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ int board_fit_config_name_match(const char *name)
>         } else if (is_mx6dqp()) {
>                 if (!strcmp(name, "imx6qp-sabresd"))
>                         return 0;
> -       } else if (is_mx6dl()) {
> +       } else if (is_mx6dl() || is_mx6solo()) {

I thought that NXP did not manufacture any mx6solo sabresd board, only
mx6dl/q/qp sabresd.

Do you have access to a mx6solo sabresd? Or did you make this change
because you have designed your own
board based on the sabresd with a mx6solo device.

Please clarify.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list