[PATCH 0/9] arm: dts: ls1028a: sync device tree with linux

Michael Walle michael at walle.cc
Tue Aug 31 23:19:20 CEST 2021


Am 2021-08-31 20:51, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 05:40:19PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> This series sync the device tree of the LS1028A SoC with the linux 
>> one.
>> To ease future debugging and reviewing, we first clean up the existing 
>> one,
>> removing bogus nodes, moving all CCSR related nodes in /soc and update 
>> the
>> drivers to accept the offical compatible strings.
>> 
>> This was tested on a sl28 board, but the ls1028a.dtsi sync also 
>> affects the
>> LS1028A-RDB and -QDS. It would be nice if someone could actually test 
>> it on
>> such a board.
>> 
>> I didn't sync the device trees for the NXP boards because u-boot 
>> related
>> things aren't split into its own -u-boot.dtsi file. So I'll leave that 
>> task
>> to NXP :)
>> 
>> The following patch is a prerequisite for this series:
>>   
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210825210510.24766-1-trini@konsulko.com/
> 
> Thanks for the work, this is appreciated.
> 
> So this needs a v2, but in general, who do you expect to pick up your 
> patches?

Mh, I haven't found a rule how patches are picked up in u-boot but most 
of the
time they go through the qoriq git tree. Why do you ask?

> After reviewing the patches I noticed further cleanup to be done, we
> need to replace
> 	phy-mode = "sgmii-2500";
> with
> 	phy-mode = "2500base-x";
> 
> and
> 	phy-mode = "xfi";
> with
> 	phy-mode = "10gbase-r";
> 
> and then delete the fsl_enetc.c driver's support for
> PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XFI and PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII, that's completely
> bogus.

Ok, that sounds easy enough. Will pick that up.

-michael


More information about the U-Boot mailing list