[PATCH 0/9] arm: dts: ls1028a: sync device tree with linux
Michael Walle
michael at walle.cc
Tue Aug 31 23:19:20 CEST 2021
Am 2021-08-31 20:51, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 05:40:19PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>> This series sync the device tree of the LS1028A SoC with the linux
>> one.
>> To ease future debugging and reviewing, we first clean up the existing
>> one,
>> removing bogus nodes, moving all CCSR related nodes in /soc and update
>> the
>> drivers to accept the offical compatible strings.
>>
>> This was tested on a sl28 board, but the ls1028a.dtsi sync also
>> affects the
>> LS1028A-RDB and -QDS. It would be nice if someone could actually test
>> it on
>> such a board.
>>
>> I didn't sync the device trees for the NXP boards because u-boot
>> related
>> things aren't split into its own -u-boot.dtsi file. So I'll leave that
>> task
>> to NXP :)
>>
>> The following patch is a prerequisite for this series:
>>
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20210825210510.24766-1-trini@konsulko.com/
>
> Thanks for the work, this is appreciated.
>
> So this needs a v2, but in general, who do you expect to pick up your
> patches?
Mh, I haven't found a rule how patches are picked up in u-boot but most
of the
time they go through the qoriq git tree. Why do you ask?
> After reviewing the patches I noticed further cleanup to be done, we
> need to replace
> phy-mode = "sgmii-2500";
> with
> phy-mode = "2500base-x";
>
> and
> phy-mode = "xfi";
> with
> phy-mode = "10gbase-r";
>
> and then delete the fsl_enetc.c driver's support for
> PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XFI and PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_XGMII, that's completely
> bogus.
Ok, that sounds easy enough. Will pick that up.
-michael
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list