[RFC PATCH v2 1/2] optee: obtain emmc rpmb info from dt
Igor Opaniuk
igor.opaniuk at foundries.io
Tue Feb 9 00:33:11 CET 2021
Hi Patrick,
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 5:06 PM Patrick DELAUNAY
<patrick.delaunay at foss.st.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Igor,
>
> On 1/24/21 10:39 AM, Igor Opaniuk wrote:
> > From: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk at foundries.io>
> >
> > Add support for rpmb-dev property in optee node.
> > Prioritize that provided eMMC info from DT for RPMB operations over
> > the one provided by OP-TEE OS core in RPC calls.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk at foundries.io>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Return NULL instead of ERR_PTR(-ENXIO) in get_rpmb_dev in case there
> > is no rpmb-dev property or somemithing went wrong
> >
> > drivers/tee/optee/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/tee/optee/rpmb.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > index b898c32edc..828ab9b00a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/core.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <mmc.h>
> >
> > #include "optee_smc.h"
> > #include "optee_msg.h"
> > @@ -607,14 +608,46 @@ static optee_invoke_fn *get_invoke_func(struct udevice *dev)
> > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > }
> >
> > +static struct mmc *get_rpmb_dev(struct udevice *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct udevice *mmc_dev;
> > + const fdt32_t *phandle_p;
> > + u32 phandle;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + debug("optee: looking for rpmb device in DT.\n");
> > +
> > + phandle_p = ofnode_get_property(dev_ofnode(dev),
> > + "rpmb-dev", NULL);
> > + if (!phandle_p) {
> > + debug("optee: missing \"rpmb-dev\" property\n");
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + phandle = fdt32_to_cpu(*phandle_p);
> > +
> > + ret = uclass_get_device_by_phandle_id(UCLASS_MMC, phandle, &mmc_dev);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + printf("optee: invalid phandle value in \"rpmb-dev\".\n");
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + debug("optee: using phandle %d from \"rpmd-dev\" property.\n",
> > + phandle);
> > + return mmc_get_mmc_dev(mmc_dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int optee_of_to_plat(struct udevice *dev)
> > {
> > struct optee_pdata *pdata = dev_get_plat(dev);
> > + struct optee_private *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
> >
> > pdata->invoke_fn = get_invoke_func(dev);
> > if (IS_ERR(pdata->invoke_fn))
> > return PTR_ERR(pdata->invoke_fn);
> >
>
> Normally optee_of_to_plat should initialized only the platdata and not the private date
> (initialized during probe or driver execution)
To be honest that was my initial intention to do that way,
but that would have required a complete overhaul of all functions in
optee/rpmb.c,
so I just tried to find a "golden mean" between the approach you described
and something less intrusive.
>
> And no need to initialize rpmb_mmcif CONFIG_CMD_OPTEE_RPMBI is not activated,
Yeah, will fix that.
>
> I proposed:
>
> struct optee_pdata {
> optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn;
> struct mmc *rpmb_mmc;
> };
>
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMD_OPTEE_RPMBI))
>
> + pdata->rpmb_mmc = get_rpmb_dev(dev);
>
> > + priv->rpmb_mmc = get_rpmb_dev(dev);
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > index 1f07a27ee4..8e5a280622 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > @@ -19,8 +19,8 @@
> > */
> > struct optee_private {
> > struct mmc *rpmb_mmc;
> > - int rpmb_dev_id;
> > int rpmb_original_part;
> > + bool rpmb_inited;
> > };
> >
> > struct optee_msg_arg;
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/rpmb.c b/drivers/tee/optee/rpmb.c
> > index 0804fc963c..0137c44be1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/rpmb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpmb.c
> > @@ -45,55 +45,67 @@ static void release_mmc(struct optee_private *priv)
> > {
> > int rc;
> >
> > - if (!priv->rpmb_mmc)
> > + if (!priv->rpmb_mmc || !priv->rpmb_inited)
> > return;
> >
> > - rc = blk_select_hwpart_devnum(IF_TYPE_MMC, priv->rpmb_dev_id,
> > - priv->rpmb_original_part);
> > + rc = mmc_switch_part(priv->rpmb_mmc, priv->rpmb_original_part);
> > if (rc)
> > debug("%s: blk_select_hwpart_devnum() failed: %d\n",
> > __func__, rc);
> >
> > - priv->rpmb_mmc = NULL;
> > + priv->rpmb_inited = false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int check_mmc(struct mmc *mmc)
> > +{
> > + if (!mmc) {
> > + debug("Cannot find RPMB device\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > + if (!(mmc->version & MMC_VERSION_MMC)) {
> > + debug("Device id is not an eMMC device\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > + if (mmc->version < MMC_VERSION_4_41) {
> > + debug("RPMB is not supported before version 4.41\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
> >
> > static struct mmc *get_mmc(struct optee_private *priv, int dev_id)
> > {
> > - struct mmc *mmc;
> > int rc;
> >
> > - if (priv->rpmb_mmc && priv->rpmb_dev_id == dev_id)
> > + if (priv->rpmb_mmc && priv->rpmb_inited)
> > return priv->rpmb_mmc;
> >
> > release_mmc(priv);
>
> really need to release mmc here (it is not initialized) as the first test of
>
> the called function is:
>
> if (!priv->rpmb_mmc || !priv->rpmb_inited)
>
>
> >
> > - mmc = find_mmc_device(dev_id);
> > - if (!mmc) {
> > - debug("Cannot find RPMB device\n");
> > - return NULL;
> > - }
> > - if (!(mmc->version & MMC_VERSION_MMC)) {
> > - debug("Device id %d is not an eMMC device\n", dev_id);
> > - return NULL;
> > - }
> > - if (mmc->version < MMC_VERSION_4_41) {
> > - debug("Device id %d: RPMB not supported before version 4.41\n",
> > - dev_id);
> > + /*
> > + * Check if priv->rpmb_mmc was already set from DT node,
> > + * otherwise use dev_id provided by OP-TEE OS
> > + * and find mmc device by its dev_id
> > + */
> > + if (!priv->rpmb_mmc)
> > + priv->rpmb_mmc = find_mmc_device(dev_id);
>
>
>
> if (plat->rpmb_mmc)
>
> priv->rpmb_mmc = plat->rpmb_mmc
> else
> priv->rpmb_mmc = find_mmc_device(dev_id);
>
>
> and priv->rpmb_inited is nore more required (if priv->rpmb_mmc = NULL; on each error)
>
> > +
> > + rc = check_mmc(priv->rpmb_mmc);
> > + if (rc)
> > return NULL;
> > - }
> >
> > - priv->rpmb_original_part = mmc_get_blk_desc(mmc)->hwpart;
> > + priv->rpmb_original_part = mmc_get_blk_desc(priv->rpmb_mmc)->hwpart;
> >
> > - rc = blk_select_hwpart_devnum(IF_TYPE_MMC, dev_id, MMC_PART_RPMB);
> > + rc = mmc_switch_part(priv->rpmb_mmc, MMC_PART_RPMB);
> > if (rc) {
> > debug("Device id %d: cannot select RPMB partition: %d\n",
> > dev_id, rc);
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > - priv->rpmb_mmc = mmc;
> > - priv->rpmb_dev_id = dev_id;
> > - return mmc;
> > + priv->rpmb_inited = true;
> > + return priv->rpmb_mmc;
> > }
> >
> > static u32 rpmb_get_dev_info(u16 dev_id, struct rpmb_dev_info *info)
>
>
> regards
>
>
> Patrick
>
The principal problem here is a new "rpmb-dev" property for optee DT
node which I introduced
in this patch set. As in Linux all RPMB RPC calls are handled by tee
supplicant running
in user space, unlikely I can somehow justify why we need that
additional property
if it is not going to be used by optee linux kernel driver.
We can still have a temporary approach with u-boot-specific property
(something like `u-boot,rpmb-dev` in u-boot specific dtsi), but that will
create additional fragmentation and divergence between U-Boot/Linux,
which I want to avoid. So I'm still thinking about what could be a
better solution here.
For additional details please check [1]
[1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/issues/4343
--
Best regards - Freundliche Grüsse - Meilleures salutations
Igor Opaniuk
Embedded Software Engineer
T: +380 938364067
E: igor.opaniuk at foundries.io
W: www.foundries.io
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list