[PATCH v3 04/38] ppc: qemu: Support non-identity PCI bus address
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Fri Feb 26 15:15:57 CET 2021
Hi Priyanka,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 5:29 PM Priyanka Jain (OSS)
<priyanka.jain at oss.nxp.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: U-Boot <u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Bin Meng
> >Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 2:52 PM
> >To: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>; Alexander Graf <agraf at csgraf.de>;
> >Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain at nxp.com>
> >Cc: U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> >Subject: [PATCH v3 04/38] ppc: qemu: Support non-identity PCI bus address
> >
> >When QEMU originally supported the ppce500 machine back in Jan 2014, it was
> >created with a 1:1 mapping of PCI bus address. Things seemed to change rapidly
> >that in Nov 2014 with the following QEMU commits:
> >
> >commit e6b4e5f4795b ("PPC: e500: Move CCSR and MMIO space to upper end of
> >address space")
> >
> >and
> >
> >commit cb3778a0455a ("PPC: e500 pci host: Add support for ATMUs")
> >
> >the PCI memory and IO physical address were moved to beyond 4 GiB, but PCI bus
> >address remained below 4 GiB, hence a non-identity mapping was created.
> >Unfortunately corresponding U-Boot updates were missed along with the QEMU
> >changes and the U-Boot QEMU ppce500 PCI support has been broken since then.
> >
> >This commit makes the PCI (non-DM version) work again.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn at gmail.com>
> >---
> >
> >(no changes since v1)
> >
> > board/freescale/qemu-ppce500/qemu-ppce500.c | 29 ++++++++++++++-----------
> >----
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/board/freescale/qemu-ppce500/qemu-ppce500.c
> >b/board/freescale/qemu-ppce500/qemu-ppce500.c
> >index aa5774f..1d68d30 100644
> >--- a/board/freescale/qemu-ppce500/qemu-ppce500.c
> >+++ b/board/freescale/qemu-ppce500/qemu-ppce500.c
> >@@ -85,20 +85,24 @@ int checkboard(void) }
> >
> > static int pci_map_region(void *fdt, int pci_node, int range_id,
> >- phys_size_t *ppaddr, pci_addr_t *pvaddr,
> >- pci_size_t *psize, ulong *pmap_addr)
> >+ phys_addr_t *pbaddr, phys_size_t *ppaddr,
> >+ pci_addr_t *pvaddr, pci_size_t *psize,
> >+ ulong *pmap_addr)
> > {
> >- uint64_t addr;
> >+ uint64_t baddr;
> >+ uint64_t paddr;
> > uint64_t size;
> > ulong map_addr;
> > int r;
> >
> >- r = fdt_read_range(fdt, pci_node, range_id, NULL, &addr, &size);
> >+ r = fdt_read_range(fdt, pci_node, range_id, &baddr, &paddr, &size);
> > if (r)
> > return r;
> >
> >+ if (pbaddr)
> >+ *pbaddr = baddr;
> > if (ppaddr)
> >- *ppaddr = addr;
> >+ *ppaddr = paddr;
> > if (psize)
> > *psize = size;
> >
> >@@ -115,7 +119,7 @@ static int pci_map_region(void *fdt, int pci_node, int
> >range_id,
> > return -1;
> >
> > /* Map virtual memory for range */
> >- assert(!tlb_map_range(map_addr, addr, size, TLB_MAP_IO));
> >+ assert(!tlb_map_range(map_addr, paddr, size, TLB_MAP_IO));
> > *pmap_addr = map_addr + size;
> >
> > if (pvaddr)
> >@@ -166,24 +170,19 @@ void pci_init_board(void)
> > pci_info.regs = fdt_translate_address(fdt, pci_node, reg);
> >
> > /* Map MMIO range */
> >- r = pci_map_region(fdt, pci_node, 0, &pci_info.mem_phys, NULL,
> >+ r = pci_map_region(fdt, pci_node, 0, &pci_info.mem_bus,
> >+ &pci_info.mem_phys, NULL,
> > &pci_info.mem_size, &map_addr);
> > if (r)
> > break;
> >
> > /* Map PIO range */
> >- r = pci_map_region(fdt, pci_node, 1, &pci_info.io_phys, NULL,
> >+ r = pci_map_region(fdt, pci_node, 1, &pci_info.io_bus,
> >+ &pci_info.io_phys, NULL,
> > &pci_info.io_size, &map_addr);
> > if (r)
> > break;
> >
> >- /*
> >- * The PCI framework finds virtual addresses for the buses
> >- * through our address map, so tell it the physical addresses.
> >- */
> >- pci_info.mem_bus = pci_info.mem_phys;
> >- pci_info.io_bus = pci_info.io_phys;
> >-
> > /* Instantiate */
> > pci_info.pci_num = pci_num + 1;
> >
> >--
> >2.7.4
>
> Kindly fix below checkpatch warnings, checks:
> WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
> #10:
> commit e6b4e5f4795b ("PPC: e500: Move CCSR and MMIO space to upper end of address space")
>
> WARNING: Unknown commit id 'e6b4e5f4795b', maybe rebased or not pulled?
> #10:
> commit e6b4e5f4795b ("PPC: e500: Move CCSR and MMIO space to upper end of address space")
>
> WARNING: Unknown commit id 'cb3778a0455a', maybe rebased or not pulled?
> #14:
> commit cb3778a0455a ("PPC: e500 pci host: Add support for ATMUs")
>
> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u64' over 'uint64_t'
> #45: FILE: board/freescale/qemu-ppce500/qemu-ppce500.c:92:
> + uint64_t baddr;
>
> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u64' over 'uint64_t'
> #46: FILE: board/freescale/qemu-ppce500/qemu-ppce500.c:93:
> + uint64_t paddr;
>
> total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 2 checks, 65 lines checked
I checked all checkpatch warnings of this series before sending out
for review, and I think all issues you mentioned are something that we
don't need to fix.
Sorry I should have mentioned above in the cover letter.
Regards,
Bin
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list