[PATCH v2 10/10] bdinfo: Change to use bdinfo_print_num_ll() where the number could be 64-bit
Bin Meng
bmeng.cn at gmail.com
Sun Jan 31 13:36:06 CET 2021
From: Bin Meng <bin.meng at windriver.com>
There are some calls to bdinfo_print_num_l() with parameters that
could be a 64-bit value on a 32-bit system. Change those calls to
use bdinfo_print_num_ll() instead.
Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng at windriver.com>
---
(no changes since v1)
arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c | 8 ++++----
cmd/bdinfo.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c b/arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c
index 4a98cb7ef5..c905783bdc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/bdinfo.c
@@ -18,14 +18,14 @@ void arch_print_bdinfo(void)
bdinfo_print_num_l("arch_number", bd->bi_arch_number);
#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_MEM_RESERVE_SECURE
if (gd->arch.secure_ram & MEM_RESERVE_SECURE_SECURED) {
- bdinfo_print_num_l("Secure ram",
- gd->arch.secure_ram &
- MEM_RESERVE_SECURE_ADDR_MASK);
+ bdinfo_print_num_ll("Secure ram",
+ gd->arch.secure_ram &
+ MEM_RESERVE_SECURE_ADDR_MASK);
}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_RESV_RAM
if (gd->arch.resv_ram)
- bdinfo_print_num_l("Reserved ram", gd->arch.resv_ram);
+ bdinfo_print_num_ll("Reserved ram", gd->arch.resv_ram);
#endif
#if !(CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_ICACHE_OFF) && CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_DCACHE_OFF))
bdinfo_print_num_l("TLB addr", gd->arch.tlb_addr);
diff --git a/cmd/bdinfo.c b/cmd/bdinfo.c
index 996546faf3..dfd50ae849 100644
--- a/cmd/bdinfo.c
+++ b/cmd/bdinfo.c
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ static void print_bi_dram(const struct bd_info *bd)
for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS; ++i) {
if (bd->bi_dram[i].size) {
bdinfo_print_num_l("DRAM bank", i);
- bdinfo_print_num_l("-> start", bd->bi_dram[i].start);
- bdinfo_print_num_l("-> size", bd->bi_dram[i].size);
+ bdinfo_print_num_ll("-> start", bd->bi_dram[i].start);
+ bdinfo_print_num_ll("-> size", bd->bi_dram[i].size);
}
}
}
--
2.25.1
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list