u-boot and mtdparts
Marek Behún
marek.behun at nic.cz
Thu Jul 15 20:13:55 CEST 2021
Hello Tom and others,
many boards still use the obsolete mtdparts command.
What is the plan with this command? Do we still want to support it?
Recently as discovered by Masami, my patch
mtd: spi-nor: allow registering multiple MTDs when DM is enabled
caused that mtds may have different name than that defined in
CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT.
Masami fixed his board by putting the partition definitions into
devicetree, but there are still many boards that may be broken.
The easy fix here is to make mtd_device_matches_name() in
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c to support the old names. Most of them are in
format "type.id", for example "nor.1", "nand.1", but some are different.
The problem is that I do not know how exactly to match these names with
the devices. Does the number represent the bus, or chip select or
something else?
There are also multiple parsers of the mtdparts string (at least two,
one in cmd/mtdparts.c and the other in drivers/mtd/mtd_uboot.c).
IMO the proper solution would be to get rid of the mtdparts entirely,
move it to devicetree, and add code that generates the mtdparts string
for Linux' command line from devicetree.
What do you think?
Marek
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list