[PATCH v6 0/5] of-platdata: Avoid building libfdt

[Simon Glass]

Hi Tom,

On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 at 14:32, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 10:13:42AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> > The original patch of this series was sent in September 2019 but
> > unfortunately caused build problems on some boards, since they don't
> > comply with the of-platdata rules.
> >
> > With of-platdata, the idea is to compile the device tree into C structures
> > to save space and avoid needing to use libfdt. But some boards use
> > of-platdata while also using libfdt in a few areas, thus defeating the
> > purpose of of-platdata.
> >
> > This series includes the original two patches
> >
> >    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1167420/
> >    http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1167367/
> >
> > as well as a few other patches to fix the build errors. Overall this
> > reduces code size and provides better error messages when unavailable
> > functions are used.
> >
> > Board maintainers should still take a look at the result, adjusting the
> > of-platdata support as needed.
> >
> > Note: This series was resent a year ago but not applied. Since then, some
> > boards have ended up using drivers in SPL which require OF_CONTROL, but
> > SPL_OF_CONTROL is not enabled. So now we have two problems. This series
> > fixes that one also.
> >
> > The problems will keep getting worse if people are not aware that
> > something is wrong. Therefore I think this patch series should be applied
> > ASAP.
>
> OK, so I took 5/6 and 6/6 and fired off a build.  The only fails-to-link
> now are:
> am335x_boneblack_vboot am335x_evm am335x_evm_spiboot
>
> So are all of the other problems still present?  I'm going to look in to
> the am335x failures.

I got a passing build here:

https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm/-/pipelines/8398

I am wondering if I did something wrong when sending?

Regards,
SImon