[PATCH v3] dm: i2c: Add a migration method for I2C

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:41:42AM +1300, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 08:30, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 08:11:30AM +1300, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 08:05, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 06:48:26AM +1300, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > Hi Tom,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 04:59, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:39:28PM +1300, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > This probably should have been done a while back since it is a core
> > > > > > > system. Add a migration deadline of later this year, to catch the
> > > > > > > stragglers.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What boards trigger this warning when done on top of say the
> > > > > > WIP/remove-non-AHCI_LIBATA-drivers branch I've pushed to my github or
> > > > > > WIP/make-DM_PCI-fatal which has more removals, but I need to cycle back
> > > > > > to and finish removing even more boards I suspect.
> > > > >
> > > > > With us/WIP/make-DM_PCI-fatal it looks like 250.
> > > >
> > > > Ugh.  Can you link me the CI run please?  I'm curious about which.
> > >
> > > Sorry, I did it locally
> > >
> > > https://pastebin.com/Wq8vgtSx
> >
> > I'm having trouble with that, sorry.  It looks like it's complaining
> > about boards that with your series applied locally don't throw up a
> > warning about I2C (but do for DM_ETH, which already has a soon
> > deadline).
> 
> Yes I was just going off the number of migration messages in the
> output (using grep).
> 
> >
> > > > Then we can introduce this warning for v2021.04 (I'll grab it shortly)
> > > > and set the deadline of v2022.04 (a year of being loud) and hopefully
> > > > things are migrated / otherwise removed before v2024.04 and they get
> > > > nuked like we're starting with now on v2019.xx deadlines.
> > >
> > > Do you mean 2022.04? My view has become that things that haven't been
> > > done probably won't be, so we should save ourselves the trouble and
> > > cost of maintaining the boards and just remove them now. For example,
> > > the Kconfig migration would be in much better shape (although I
> > > haven't analysed how much better).
> > >
> > > Note I sent a series to clean up the warnings, plus add I2C and GPIO,
> > > so you should look at that instead of this patch.
> >
> > Well, lets get some numbers on what boards throw this I2C warning first.
> > I did a quick merge of this series and pushed WIP/add-DM_I2C-warning
> > right now and I'm doing the before/after build now.
> 
> OK.

So, the list of DM_I2C violators is:
am335x_guardian am335x_shc am335x_shc_ict am335x_shc_netboot
am335x_shc_sdboot cm_t335 cm_t43 chiliboard am335x_igep003x draco etamin
rastaban thuban pxm2 rut am335x_sl50 am335x_baltos igep00x0 omap3_beagle
omap3_evm devkit8000 omap4_panda omap4_sdp4430 omap5_uevm all of which
are using the omap i2c driver, which has been converted.  I've fired off
a CI build now that just makes DM_I2C default y, lets see what still has
a warning then.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20210325/f2a22bce/attachment.sig>