Pull request for efi-2021-10-rc4

Heinrich Schuchardt xypron.glpk at gmx.de
Sat Sep 4 15:08:38 CEST 2021



Am 4. September 2021 15:01:11 MESZ schrieb Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>:
>On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 11:56:47AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>> Dear Tom,
>> 
>> The following changes since commit 94509b79b13e69c209199af0757afbde8d2ebd6d:
>> 
>>   btrfs: Use default subvolume as filesystem root (2021-09-01 10:11:24
>> -0400)
>> 
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>> 
>>   https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi.git
>> tags/efi-2021-10-rc4
>> 
>> for you to fetch changes up to 1dfa494610c5469cc28cf1f8538abf4be6c00324:
>> 
>>   efi_loader: fix efi_tcg2_hash_log_extend_event() parameter check
>> (2021-09-04 09:15:09 +0200)
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Pull request for efi-2021-10-rc4
>> 
>> Documentation:
>> 
>>     Remove invalid reference to configuration variable in UEFI doc
>> 
>> UEFI:
>> 
>>     Parameter checks for the EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL
>>     Improve support of preseeding UEFI variables.
>>     Correct the calculation of the size of loaded images.
>>     Allow for UEFI images with zero VirtualSize
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Heinrich Schuchardt (5):
>>       efi_loader: sections with zero VirtualSize
>>       efi_loader: rounding of image size
>>       efi_loader: don't load signature database from file
>>       efi_loader: efi_auth_var_type for AuditMode, DeployedMode
>>       efi_loader: correct determination of secure boot state
>> 
>> Masahisa Kojima (3):
>>       efi_loader: add missing parameter check for EFI_TCG2_PROTOCOL api
>>       efi_loader: fix boot_service_capability_min calculation
>>       efi_loader: fix efi_tcg2_hash_log_extend_event() parameter check
>
>And I don't see Simon's revert in here either.  And he asked you about
>that yesterday:
>https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAPnjgZ3eRdjF0jb9S-cJK6y+feuyRyWf0hNkf2triB4DR4UFBQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
>So at this point, are you asserting there is nothing to revert?
>
>-- 
>Tom

Never. Simons "revert" is breaking functionality. The concept for suporting blobs in devicetrees supplied by a prior bootstage has not been defined yet.

See the discussion on the ML.

Best regards

Heinrich 


More information about the U-Boot mailing list