[PATCH v2 3/3] RFC: doc: Add documentation about devicetree usage

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 02:53:46AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 08:48, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
[snip]
> > We should, when applicable, submit our bindings upstream just like any
> > other project.  We also want to make sure that when we do so, we hold
> > ourselves to a high standard.
> 
> I wonder if should just try just try that again, just to see what
> happens. I vaguely remember the UART clock thing from many years ago,
> being told that we should just probe the whole clock driver and then
> have a debug UART...
> 
> But it really isn't up to Linux to refuse to accept U-Boot bindings,
> IMO. U-Boot has much right to u-boot, as Linux does to linux,

A bit late, but yes, between then and now I believe things have changed
and there is a more broad acceptance that just because the primary
repository for device trees and bindings is the linux kernel does not
mean that only the linux kernel needs to be considered.  So we really do
need to pick something, polish it up, and then subject ourselves to
review.

-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20210910/d5419ecb/attachment.sig>