[PATCH] test/py: tpm2: Skip tpm pytest based on env variable

[T Karthik Reddy]

Hi Tom,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 5, 2021 6:53 PM
> To: T Karthik Reddy <tkarthik at xilinx.com>
> Cc: Ashok Reddy Soma <ashokred at xilinx.com>; u-boot at lists.denx.de;
> miquel.raynal at bootlin.com; git <git at xilinx.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/py: tpm2: Skip tpm pytest based on env variable
> 
> On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 05:56:50AM +0000, T Karthik Reddy wrote:
> > Hello Tom Rini,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 8:52 PM
> > > To: Ashok Reddy Soma <ashokred at xilinx.com>
> > > Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de; miquel.raynal at bootlin.com; git
> > > <git at xilinx.com>; T Karthik Reddy <tkarthik at xilinx.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/py: tpm2: Skip tpm pytest based on env
> > > variable
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 06:18:26AM -0600, Ashok Reddy Soma wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: T Karthik Reddy <t.karthik.reddy at xilinx.com>
> > > >
> > > > Tpm test cases relies on tpm device setup. Provide an environment
> > > > variable "env__tpm_device_test_skip = True" to skip the test case
> > > > if tpm device is not present.
> > > > Only needed will have to add variable to the py-test framework.
> > > > Test runs successfully even this variable is absent.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: T Karthik Reddy <t.karthik.reddy at xilinx.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ashok Reddy Soma <ashok.reddy.soma at xilinx.com>
> > >
> > > Why is this not using boardenv_* like other tests do to disable running?
> >
> > What I meant here was this test doesn't depend on configuration value
> > from boardenv_*. But it uses env__tpm_device_test_skip variable from
> the configuration file.
> > I referred test/py/tests/test_sleep.py for writing this test case, hence
> copied comments as well.
> > Should I change this NOTE in comment section?
> 
> Thanks for explaining.  This got me to re-read the existing tests and while
> none of it is as clear as I would like, your example here is just as clear as the
> rest, so it's fine and I'll pick it up soon.

I see this patch is not yet applied on the repo, could you please let me know when this will be applied?

Thanks
T karthik 

> 
> --
> Tom