[PATCH] Nokia RX-51: Convert to CONFIG_DM_KEYBOARD

[Pali Rohár]

On Thursday 03 February 2022 15:02:02 Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 14:53, Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:45:44PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 04:16:23PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 07:38:50PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali at kernel.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > I would really appreciate if U-Boot test framework starts printing
> > > > > deprecation warnings, instead of sending patches which directly drop
> > > > > support for some boards.
> > > > >
> > > > > There is absolutely no warning during building U-Boot for RX-51 board
> > > > > that this board has not been converted to DM_KEYBOARD yet.
> > > >
> > > > Please send some patch that implements what you're wanting to see for
> > > > how to make the warnings more visible.  I do agree the warning for
> > > > v2022.10 only showed up after the merge to -next once v2022.01 came out,
> > > > but it's still a fairly long time to clean up the few unconverted
> > > > boards.
> > >
> > > Oh, I see what's going on.  Simon, the DM_KEYBOARD check isn't
> > > triggering for any boards.  I'll look more.
> >
> > And here's where we're at.  nokia_rx51 doesn't set CONFIG_KEYBOARD, so
> > didn't trigger the warning about  migration.  Every platform that sets
> > CONFIG_KEYBOARD is migrated.  I don't know how many other platforms are
> > in the situation nokia_rx51 is in.  Yanking out the legacy code and
> > seeing what fails to build, and going from there is probably the next
> > option.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> As to your questoin, none that I know of. I sent a series to drop
> cfb_console which was how this used to work, although in fact it
> hasn't worked for a while. The problem here seems to be that this
> board was multiple migrations behind and so was not caught.

It is not truth that cfb_console has not worked. This driver is / was
working fine on n900 without any issues.

> We should be able to remove the migration check.
> 
> Pali, just to explain from the other POV, I am finding it increasingly
> frustrating dealing with ad-hoc CONFIG options, old drivers, etc. We
> really need to complete some of the migrations we started 6 years ago.
> 
> Regards,
> Simon

Well, I see and understand you. But as I explained it more times, it was
me who is/was waiting for review of n900 patches and I was not able to
speed up review process. There was always some n900 patch in waiting
state.

Now when pending n900 patches were reviewed and merged, I prepared and
sent another one -- this DM_KEYBOARD which removes one part of
cfb_console code from n900 board code.