[PATCH v4] sf: Query write-protection status before operating the flash

Michael Walle michael at walle.cc
Mon Feb 7 13:43:45 CET 2022

Am 2022-02-04 13:55, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> On 02.02.22 10:57, Jan Kiszka wrote:


>> What about also exposing a "is_unlocked" service? Seems that would 
>> have
>> the semantic we need, and there is at least already 
>> stm_is_unlocked_sr.
>> But no sst26_is_unlocked.
> From my reading of sst26_is_locked, it has "is fully unlocked" 
> semantic,
> rather than "is fully locked". Looks inconsistent today, right?

Couldn't wrap my head around that code, but I wouldn't be suprised if it


More information about the U-Boot mailing list