[PATCH 0/5] binman: Improvements to FIT entry type

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Mon Feb 7 21:22:30 CET 2022

Hi Alper,

On Sun, 6 Feb 2022 at 14:03, Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've managed to build images like in doc/chromium/chainload.rst wtih
> binman, but ran into an issue with entry expansion in FIT and worked on
> it a bit. I also added SetImagePos() because that documentation asks for
> precise placement of u-boot.bin inside the FIT and I felt like doing it
> as an easier way to know the positions.
> I would try to refactor and experiment with FIT things more, but I know
> Simon's currently working on converting SPL_FIT_GENERATOR to binman.
> Instead I'm just sending things I have already done with some tests
> added, hopefully without too many conflicts.

We'll see, but I'll apply this first in any case, to save you the trouble.

This all looks good. I've made a few comments which can be tidied up
now or later. I was hoping to send my series out this morning but I
didn't get much time over the weekend, so it might be another week.
Hopefully not.

> Alper Nebi Yasak (5):
>   binman: Fix subentry expansion for FIT entry type
>   binman: Register and check bintools from FIT subentries
>   binman: Check missing bintools of Section subclasses
>   binman: Convert FIT entry type to a subclass of Section entry type
>   binman: Update image positions of FIT subentries
>  tools/binman/etype/fit.py                     |  90 ++++++---
>  tools/binman/etype/section.py                 |   1 +
>  tools/binman/ftest.py                         | 183 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../binman/test/220_fit_subentry_bintool.dts  |  39 ++++
>  4 files changed, 287 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/binman/test/220_fit_subentry_bintool.dts
> --
> 2.34.1


More information about the U-Boot mailing list