[PATCH v2] dm: Fix OF_BAD_ADDR definition

Jan Kiszka jan.kiszka at siemens.com
Tue Feb 15 14:00:22 CET 2022


On 15.02.22 12:56, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
> Hi Jan
> 
> On 2/14/22 16:21, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 04.01.22 08:42, Patrice Chotard wrote:
>>> When OF_LIVE flag is enabled on a 64 bits platform, there is an
>>> issue when dev_read_addr() is called and need to perform an address
>>> translation using __of_translate_address().
>>>
>>> In case of error, __of_translate_address() return's value is OF_BAD_ADDR
>>> (wich is defined in include/dm/of.h to ((u64)-1) = 0xffffffffffffffff).
>>> The return value of dev_read_addr() is often compared to FDT_ADDR_T_NONE
>>> which is defined as (-1U) = 0xffffffff.
>>> In this case the comparison is always false.
>>>
>>> To fix this issue, define FDT_ADDR_T_NONE to (ulong)(-1) in case of
>>> AARCH64. Update accordingly related tests.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard at foss.st.com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2:
>>>  - define FDT_ADDR_T_NONE as ((ulong)(-1)) and keep OF_BAD_ADDR unchanged
>>>
>>>  include/fdtdec.h   | 5 ++++-
>>>  test/dm/ofnode.c   | 2 +-
>>>  test/dm/pci.c      | 4 ++--
>>>  test/dm/test-fdt.c | 2 +-
>>>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/fdtdec.h b/include/fdtdec.h
>>> index 6c7ab887b2..e9e2916d6e 100644
>>> --- a/include/fdtdec.h
>>> +++ b/include/fdtdec.h
>>> @@ -24,16 +24,19 @@
>>>  typedef phys_addr_t fdt_addr_t;
>>>  typedef phys_size_t fdt_size_t;
>>>  
>>> -#define FDT_ADDR_T_NONE (-1U)
>>>  #define FDT_SIZE_T_NONE (-1U)
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
>>> +#define FDT_ADDR_T_NONE ((ulong)(-1))
>>> +
>>>  #define fdt_addr_to_cpu(reg) be64_to_cpu(reg)
>>>  #define fdt_size_to_cpu(reg) be64_to_cpu(reg)
>>>  #define cpu_to_fdt_addr(reg) cpu_to_be64(reg)
>>>  #define cpu_to_fdt_size(reg) cpu_to_be64(reg)
>>>  typedef fdt64_t fdt_val_t;
>>>  #else
>>> +#define FDT_ADDR_T_NONE (-1U)
>>> +
>>>  #define fdt_addr_to_cpu(reg) be32_to_cpu(reg)
>>>  #define fdt_size_to_cpu(reg) be32_to_cpu(reg)
>>>  #define cpu_to_fdt_addr(reg) cpu_to_be32(reg)
>>> diff --git a/test/dm/ofnode.c b/test/dm/ofnode.c
>>> index cea0746bb3..e6c925eba6 100644
>>> --- a/test/dm/ofnode.c
>>> +++ b/test/dm/ofnode.c
>>> @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ static int dm_test_ofnode_get_reg(struct unit_test_state *uts)
>>>  	ut_assert(ofnode_valid(node));
>>>  	addr = ofnode_get_addr(node);
>>>  	size = ofnode_get_size(node);
>>> -	ut_asserteq(FDT_ADDR_T_NONE, addr);
>>> +	ut_asserteq_64(FDT_ADDR_T_NONE, addr);
>>>  	ut_asserteq(FDT_SIZE_T_NONE, size);
>>>  
>>>  	node = ofnode_path("/translation-test at 8000/noxlatebus at 3,300/dev at 42");
>>> diff --git a/test/dm/pci.c b/test/dm/pci.c
>>> index fa2e4a8559..00e4440a9d 100644
>>> --- a/test/dm/pci.c
>>> +++ b/test/dm/pci.c
>>> @@ -331,10 +331,10 @@ static int dm_test_pci_addr_live(struct unit_test_state *uts)
>>>  	struct udevice *swap1f, *swap1;
>>>  
>>>  	ut_assertok(dm_pci_bus_find_bdf(PCI_BDF(0, 0x1f, 0), &swap1f));
>>> -	ut_asserteq(FDT_ADDR_T_NONE, dev_read_addr_pci(swap1f));
>>> +	ut_asserteq_64(FDT_ADDR_T_NONE, dev_read_addr_pci(swap1f));
>>>  
>>>  	ut_assertok(dm_pci_bus_find_bdf(PCI_BDF(0, 0x1, 0), &swap1));
>>> -	ut_asserteq(FDT_ADDR_T_NONE, dev_read_addr_pci(swap1));
>>> +	ut_asserteq_64(FDT_ADDR_T_NONE, dev_read_addr_pci(swap1));
>>>  
>>>  	return 0;
>>>  }
>>> diff --git a/test/dm/test-fdt.c b/test/dm/test-fdt.c
>>> index 8866d4d959..e1de066226 100644
>>> --- a/test/dm/test-fdt.c
>>> +++ b/test/dm/test-fdt.c
>>> @@ -768,7 +768,7 @@ static int dm_test_fdt_livetree_writing(struct unit_test_state *uts)
>>>  	/* Test setting generic properties */
>>>  
>>>  	/* Non-existent in DTB */
>>> -	ut_asserteq(FDT_ADDR_T_NONE, dev_read_addr(dev));
>>> +	ut_asserteq_64(FDT_ADDR_T_NONE, dev_read_addr(dev));
>>>  	/* reg = 0x42, size = 0x100 */
>>>  	ut_assertok(ofnode_write_prop(node, "reg", 8,
>>>  				      "\x00\x00\x00\x42\x00\x00\x01\x00"));
>>
>> Since this commit, I'm getting this dev_get_priv warning:
>>
>> [...]
>> U-Boot 2022.01-00766-g9876ae7db6d-dirty (Feb 14 2022 - 16:15:21 +0100)
>>
>> Model: SIMATIC IOT2050 Basic
>> DRAM:  1 GiB
>> Core:  94 devices, 28 uclasses, devicetree: separate
>> WDT:   Not starting watchdog at 40610000
>> MMC:   mmc at 4fa0000: 0
>> Loading Environment from SPIFlash... SF: Detected w25q128 with page size
>> 256 Bytes, erase size 64 KiB, total 16 MiB
>> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c:1744 __dev_get_priv: null device
>> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma.c:1744 __dev_get_priv: null device
>> OK
>> In:    serial
>> Out:   serial
>> Err:   serial
>> Net:   No ethernet found.
>> Hit any key to stop autoboot:  0
>>
>> (I've instrumented dev_get_priv to tell me file:line)
>>
>> Is that a sleeping problem surfaced by the commit or a real regression?
>> I can boot, though.
>>
>> Jan
>>
> 
> It should be interesting to understand why uclass_get_device_by_phandle() return tmp = NULL.

Yep.

> What's the return value of uclass_get_device_by_phandle() ?
> 

-22, EINVAL.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Technology
Competence Center Embedded Linux


More information about the U-Boot mailing list