[PATCH v2] tools: mkimage: Call verify_header after writing image to disk

[Priyanka Jain]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Pali Rohár <pali at kernel.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 1:22 AM
>To: Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain at nxp.com>
>Cc: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>; Alison Wang <alison.wang at nxp.com>;
>Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu at nxp.com>; Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat at nxp.com>;
>Jiafei Pan <jiafei.pan at nxp.com>; Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>; Alexandru
>Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me at gmail.com>; Yann Dirson <yann at blade-group.com>;
>Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>; Marek Behún <marek.behun at nic.cz>; u-
>boot at lists.denx.de
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools: mkimage: Call verify_header after writing image to
>disk
>
>On Wednesday 02 February 2022 09:06:30 Priyanka Jain wrote:
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
>> >Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2022 10:05 PM
>> >To: Pali Rohár <pali at kernel.org>; Alison Wang <alison.wang at nxp.com>;
>> >Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain at nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu
>> ><mingkai.hu at nxp.com>; Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat at nxp.com>
>> >Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>; Alexandru Gagniuc
>> ><mr.nuke.me at gmail.com>; Yann Dirson <yann at blade-group.com>; Stefan
>> >Roese <sr at denx.de>; Marek Behún <marek.behun at nic.cz>; u-
>> >boot at lists.denx.de
>> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools: mkimage: Call verify_header after
>> >writing image to disk
>> >
>> >On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 05:31:18PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> >> On Friday 21 January 2022 21:15:43 Tom Rini wrote:
>> >> > On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 02:44:22AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> >> > > On Friday 21 January 2022 16:21:33 Tom Rini wrote:
>> >> > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 06:34:43PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > If image backend provides verify_header callback then call
>> >> > > > > it after writing image to disk. This ensures that written image is
>correct.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali at kernel.org>
>> >> > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de>
>> >> > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
>> >> > > > > ---
>> >> > > > >  tools/mkimage.c | 41
>> >> > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> > > > >  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > This breaks a number of platforms such as
>> >> > > > ls1021atwr_sdcard_qspi and it's not clear to me why exactly.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Maybe they were already broken and this patch just detected it?
>> >> > > Or verify_header callback for particular image type is reject
>> >> > > valid image?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Do you have some pointers to failed build logs?
>> >> >
>> >> > Try building for ls1021atwr_sdcard_qspi with your patch applied,
>> >> > the only new thing that's shown in the logs is the error message.
>> >>
>> >> So... I have tried following without this patch:
>> >>
>> >> $ make ls1021atwr_sdcard_qspi_defconfig $ make
>> >> CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- -j8
>> >>
>> >> It generated file spl/u-boot-spl.pbl without error. Now I called -l
>> >> on this generated file for type pblimage and I got following output:
>> >>
>> >> $ ./tools/dumpimage -T pblimage -l spl/u-boot-spl.pbl GP Header:
>> >> Size
>> >> aa55aa55 LoadAddr 1ee0100
>> >>
>> >> $ ./tools/mkimage -T pblimage -l spl/u-boot-spl.pbl GP Header: Size
>> >> aa55aa55 LoadAddr 1ee0100
>> >>
>> >> "GP Header:" line is from the TI OMAP image backend type gpimage or
>> >> type omapimage (implemented in file gpimage-common.c).
>> >>
>> >> So it means that files generated by ls1021atwr_sdcard_qspi are
>> >> already broken and my patch just detected it. Or it is also
>> >> possible that validation code in pblimage.c file is incorrect and broken.
>> >>
>> >> What to do with it now?
>> >
>> >Thanks for digging.  This is a problem for a number of the ls1021,
>> >ls1043 and ls1046 platforms, so lets add some maintainers there.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Tom
>>
>>
>> I will ask NXP-platform owners to check on this.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Priyanka
>
>Hello! Any news on this?

Not yet, Actually team was busy in some other critical work.
I will try my best to get response as soon as possible.

Thanks
Priyanka