[PATCH v2 4/5] binman: Convert FIT entry type to a subclass of Section entry type
Simon Glass
sjg at chromium.org
Mon Feb 21 05:40:03 CET 2022
Hi again,
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 at 08:53, Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Alper,
>
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 at 10:34, Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 18/02/2022 19:50, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > On 15.02.22 18:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >> On 15.02.22 17:50, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >>> On 15.02.22 13:27, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
> > >>>> The AddMissingProperties() and SetCalculatedProperties() methods were
> > >>>> disabled for FIT as a fixup to this patch, that's why image-pos etc.
> > >>>> aren't available. See comments at [1] for some context.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hopefully my two patches [2][3] fix things, can you test with them?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1] "binman: Correct the error message for a bad hash algorithm"
> > >>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220208105941.1.I8f212a1150defebaf8b7b15a79f7a2fc62c276b2@changeid/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [2] "binman: Skip processing "hash" subnodes of FIT subsections"
> > >>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220209190236.26479-1-alpernebiyasak@gmail.com/
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> This one helped, indeed.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ...not completely:
> > >>
> > >> $ source/tools/binman/binman replace -i flash.bin -f fit at 0x380000.fit
> > >> fit at 0x380000binman: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/.fit at 0x380000.itb'
> > >>
> > >
> > > Ping.
> > >
> > > $ source/tools/binman/binman -D replace -i flash.bin -f fit at 0x380000.fit fit at 0x380000
> > > binman: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/.fit at 0x380000.itb'
> > >
> > > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > File "source/tools/binman/binman", line 141, in RunBinman
> > > ret_code = control.Binman(args)
> > > File "u-boot/tools/binman/control.py", line 644, in Binman
> > > allow_resize=not args.fix_size, write_map=args.map)
> > > File "u-boot/tools/binman/control.py", line 404, in ReplaceEntries
> > > allow_resize=allow_resize, write_map=write_map)
> > > File "u-boot/tools/binman/control.py", line 341, in WriteEntryToImage
> > > AfterReplace(image, allow_resize=allow_resize, write_map=write_map)
> > > File "u-boot/tools/binman/control.py", line 333, in AfterReplace
> > > get_contents=False, allow_resize=allow_resize)
> > > File "u-boot/tools/binman/control.py", line 560, in ProcessImage
> > > image.PackEntries()
> > > File "u-boot/tools/binman/image.py", line 155, in PackEntries
> > > super().Pack(0)
> > > File "u-boot/tools/binman/etype/section.py", line 385, in Pack
> > > self._PackEntries()
> > > File "u-boot/tools/binman/etype/section.py", line 403, in _PackEntries
> > > offset = entry.Pack(offset)
> > > File "u-boot/tools/binman/etype/section.py", line 390, in Pack
> > > data = self.BuildSectionData(True)
> > > File "u-boot/tools/binman/etype/fit.py", line 265, in BuildSectionData
> > > tools.write_file(input_fname, data)
> > > File "u-boot/tools/patman/tools.py", line 482, in write_file
> > > with open(filename(fname), binary and 'wb' or 'w') as fd:
> > > PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/.fit at 0x380000.itb'
> > >
> > > Something seems fairly broken here. That '/.' does not come from the
> > > output directory name, it's generated by Entry.GetUniqueName. Looks like
> > > this path should not been taken under these conditions.
> >
> > I can reproduce this and tried a few things, but more issues just kept
> > popping up (outside u-boot as well). I got it to a point where the
> > command re-packs the FIT and the image but quite wrongly. The offset and
> > image-pos properties get added in the FIT, and the image main-section
> > just concatenates all entries without regard to set offsets. I'll
> > need more time to work those out, then to add tests and send patches.
>
> I am going to try to merge my fit generator series today.
>
> One issue I notice is that the conversion to use entry_Section changes
> the contents of the self._fit_entries dict. Before it was keyed by
> relative path, but entry_section keys self._entries by node name.
>
> We may need to split it up. I will see if I can at least merge my
> series, which should not make things any worse, then see if I can come
> up with ideas.
>
> Thanks for the diff.
I did a bit more fiddling and pushed a tree to u-boot-dm/fit-working
It refactors the fit implementation to separate scanning from emitting
the tree and I think this might help quite a bit. I'll send out the
series when I get a chance in the next few days or so.
Regards,
Simon
[..]
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list