[PATCH V2 1/2] net: ravb: Add tx/rx delay flag checks and support for rgmii-rxid

Adam Ford aford173 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 25 21:10:20 CET 2022


On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 2:08 PM Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de> wrote:
>
> On 2/25/22 19:29, Adam Ford wrote:
> > Some boards like the Beacon RZ/G2 SOM use either flags for
> > tx-internal-delay-ps, rx-internal-delay-ps or rgmii-rxid.
> >
> > In Linux the APSR_RDM flag is set when either rx-internal-delay-ps
> > is set or the mode is rgmii-rxid, and the APSR_TDM is set when
> > tx-internal-delay-ps is found or rgmii-txid is set, and both
> > are set if rgmii-id is set.
> >
> > The ravb driver in U-Boot driver was missing rgmii-rxid support,
> > so add that support in a similar fashion to what is done in Linux.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173 at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > V2:  Add boolean for explit delays which skips the rgmii mode check
> >       if explicit delays are set.  This more closely matches the
> >       behavior in Linux.  Also add the same comments for the delays
> >       to match the comments found in Linux.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ravb.c b/drivers/net/ravb.c
> > index 1d1118c341..7bc8c84aaa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ravb.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ravb.c
> > @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
> >   #define CSR_OPS                     0x0000000F
> >   #define CSR_OPS_CONFIG              BIT(1)
> >
> > +#define APSR_RDM             BIT(13)
> >   #define APSR_TDM            BIT(14)
> >
> >   #define TCCR_TSRQ0          BIT(0)
> > @@ -376,6 +377,9 @@ static int ravb_dmac_init(struct udevice *dev)
> >       struct ravb_priv *eth = dev_get_priv(dev);
> >       struct eth_pdata *pdata = dev_get_plat(dev);
> >       int ret = 0;
> > +     int mode = 0;
> > +     unsigned int delay;
> > +     bool explicit_delay = false;
> >
> >       /* Set CONFIG mode */
> >       ret = ravb_reset(dev);
> > @@ -402,9 +406,33 @@ static int ravb_dmac_init(struct udevice *dev)
> >           (rmobile_get_cpu_type() == RMOBILE_CPU_TYPE_R8A77995))
> >               return 0;
> >
> > -     if ((pdata->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID) ||
> > -         (pdata->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID))
> > -             writel(APSR_TDM, eth->iobase + RAVB_REG_APSR);
> > +     if (!dev_read_u32(dev, "tx-internal-delay-ps", &delay)) {
> > +             /* Valid values are 0 and 2000, according to DT bindings */
> > +             if (delay) {
> > +                     mode |= APSR_TDM;
> > +                     explicit_delay = true;
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (!dev_read_u32(dev, "rx-internal-delay-ps", &delay)) {
> > +             /* Valid values are 0 and 1800, according to DT bindings */
> > +             if (delay) {
> > +                     mode |= APSR_RDM;
> > +                     explicit_delay = true;
> > +             }
> > +     }
>
> Any reason to reverse those two tests compared to Linux ?
> Linux does rx test before tx test, and keeps the tests sorted
> alphabetically.

It wasn't intentional.  I can swap them.

adam
>
> [...]


More information about the U-Boot mailing list