mkimage_fit_atf.sh: not found
ZHIZHIKIN Andrey
andrey.zhizhikin at leica-geosystems.com
Thu Jan 6 11:07:51 CET 2022
Hello Tim,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: U-Boot <u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Tim Harvey
> Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 8:08 PM
> To: ZHIZHIKIN Andrey <andrey.zhizhikin at leica-geosystems.com>
> Cc: u-boot <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>; Fabio Estevam
> <festevam at gmail.com>; Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de>; Adam Ford
> <aford173 at gmail.com>; Marcel Ziswiler <marcel at ziswiler.com>; Jagan Teki
> <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> Subject: Re: mkimage_fit_atf.sh: not found
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:34 AM ZHIZHIKIN Andrey
> <andrey.zhizhikin at leica-geosystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Tim,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: U-Boot <u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de> On Behalf Of Tim Harvey
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 11:48 PM
> > > To: u-boot <u-boot at lists.denx.de>; Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>; Fabio
> Estevam
> > > <festevam at gmail.com>
> > > Cc: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf at kontron.de>; Adam Ford
> > > <aford173 at gmail.com>; Marcel Ziswiler <marcel at ziswiler.com>; Jagan Teki
> > > <jagan at amarulasolutions.com>
> > > Subject: mkimage_fit_atf.sh: not found
> > >
> > > Stefano and Fabio,
> > >
> > > I'm seeing the imx8mm_venice_defconfig target failing to build on
> > > master due to mkimage_fit_atf.sh not found:
> > > ./"arch/arm/mach-imx/mkimage_fit_atf.sh" \
> > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw71xx-0x.dtb
> > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw72xx-0x.dtb
> > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw73xx-0x.dtb
> > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw7901.dtb
> > > arch/arm/dts/imx8mm-venice-gw7902.dtb > u-boot.its
> > > /bin/sh: 1: ./arch/arm/mach-imx/mkimage_fit_atf.sh: not found
> > >
> >
> > This has been dropped in d9a6f0eed6 ("tree: imx: remove old fit generator
> script")
>
> So why was that merged when it breaks several boards that are not
> switched to binman because of the CI issue?
Because the FIT generator script has been broken after commit 3f04db891a
("image: Check for unit addresses in FITs"), which has covered CVE-2021-27138.
You can see the reasoning of merging d9a6f0eed6 ("tree: imx: remove old fit
generator script") in the commit message.
In addition, d9a6f0eed6 ("tree: imx: remove old fit generator script") has
been introduced as a part of discussion stemmed from [1], where it has been
pointed out that certain boards are still using old FIT generator which is
not working, and I've listed those board config files for maintainers to react.
Binman CI missing binaries verification came later I believe, that is the
reason we are seeing those conversions pending. But this is unrelated to the
FIT generator script removal, which was broken anyways.
>
> >
> > > As far as I can tell the other boards that are still using
> > > SPL_FIT_GENERATOR also fail due to this (ie imx8mm_beacon_defconfig,
> > > imx8mq_evk_defconfig, imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2_defconfig, etc).
> >
> > imx8mq_evk is already converted and I've sent a patch for it, see [1].
> >
> > >
> > > What is the state of the binman conversion? I submitted a series to
> > > convert my boards to binman and it has just been sitting without any
> > > response for months now [1].
> >
> > I believe that the reason for your series sitting in the queue is the same as
> > for imx8mq_evk: missing binary blobs (ATF and DDR) are failing CI builds.
> >
>
> Right, so imx8mq_evk (and others) are completely broken for the
> pending release correct?
That is correct, and there are patches to address this.
There is also a patch series from Heiko to address the "missing binary" CI issue, see [2].
>
> Sounds like we need to revert d9a6f0eed6 ("tree: imx: remove old fit
> generator script")
No, because reverting this patch would bring the FIT generator which
does not produce correct images due to reasons stated above.
If there are plans to revert it - then it should also be complemented with
the patch that fixes the FIT generator. I'm not sure if this is a desired
behavior to bring back old functionality and fix it for the sake of removing
it at the later stage.
>
> Tim
>
> > >
> > > I'm not sure when the above breakage occurred but the conversion to
> > > binman resolves it and other things.
> > >
> > > Please let me know what you expect me to do to resolve this as there
> > > is a release pending.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Tim
> > > [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20211006201700.3018-1-
> > > tharvey at gateworks.com/
> >
> > -- andrey
> >
> > Link: [1]:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20211203161802.12699-1-
> andrey.zhizhikin at leica-geosystems.com/
-- andrey
Link: [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/AM6PR06MB46912C898E0D6EA797D1EB5EA6C49@AM6PR06MB4691.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com/
Link: [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20220105125816.197045-1-heiko.thiery@gmail.com/
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list