[PATCH v2 01/20] remoteproc: k3_system_controller: Support optional boot_notification channel
Tom Rini
trini at konsulko.com
Mon Jan 17 14:54:13 CET 2022
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:22:52PM +0530, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 17/01/22 11:01 am, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On 13/01/22 7:42 pm, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 01:25:26PM +0530, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com>
> >>>
> >>> If there is an optional boot notification channel that an SoC uses
> >>> separate from the rx path, use the same.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> .../remoteproc/k3-system-controller.txt | 3 +++
> >>> drivers/remoteproc/k3_system_controller.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> Binding docs are rst these days, so we should sync with upstream and
> >> then this property is already there, right?
> >>
> >
> > I will create a followup patch to convert documentation to rst. Also,
> > about the property, mbox-names property is already present but
> > "boot_notify" is a newly added channel and not are required property.
> > So, this was additionally added.
> >
>
> One more question regarding documentation, should it be changed to rst
> or yaml, as this is a device tree binding?
I mis-spoke, yeah. It should be yaml and pushed upstream first, then
brought back here.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20220117/437aca1f/attachment.sig>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list