[PATCH v3 31/31] RFC: Switch rpi over to use bootstd

[Michael Walle]

> The bootdevs have a natural priority, based on the assumed speed of
> the device, so the board would only need to intervene (with an env var
> or a devicetree property) when that is wrong.

Does this make sense in general? The default boot order for a
board should depend on what is available on board (or on the
carrier board) and what is pluggable. I doubt there can be a sane
default, so almost all boards will have to define its own
boot order anyway.

So it doesn't really matter how the general list is sorted, but
sorting by the speed of the interface sounds.. strange.

-michael