[PATCH v3 31/31] RFC: Switch rpi over to use bootstd

[Simon Glass]

Hi Mark,

On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 11:56, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis at xs4all.nl> wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 13:30:47 -0500
> > From: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 11:16:35AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 03:29, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > From: Michael Walle <michael at walle.cc>
> > > > > Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 09:35:44 +0100
> > > > >
> > > > > > The bootdevs have a natural priority, based on the assumed speed of
> > > > > > the device, so the board would only need to intervene (with an env var
> > > > > > or a devicetree property) when that is wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does this make sense in general? The default boot order for a
> > > > > board should depend on what is available on board (or on the
> > > > > carrier board) and what is pluggable. I doubt there can be a sane
> > > > > default, so almost all boards will have to define its own
> > > > > boot order anyway.
> > >
> > > Please can you be more specific about what you the problem is here? If
> > > the board does not have a device then it will not exist in driver
> > > model (or will not probe) and it won't have a bootdev (or it won't
> > > probe). That seems to be equivalent to me.
> >
> > So, I'm not sure how much of a problem it is, since the board can still
> > define the default probe order via environment.  But pick any random SoC
> > with more than 1 SD/MMC set of lines on the chip.  Youboard may put the
> > first as SD slot and second as eMMC and Myboard may do the opposite and
> > both are going to probe in the same order since it's the same chip.
> >
> > That's what I think Mark is getting at with it not really making sense
> > to just rely on probe order as what to try.
>
> Something like that.  I remember a lot of issues when boards were
> switched over to DM_MMC and the boot order changed.  I believe this
> ended up beging solved by having aliases in the device tree.

The bootdevs use the same aliases so the ordering should remain the
same in that sense.

Regards,
Simon