[PATCH 1/3] ram: rk3399: Fix .set_rate_index() error handling

[Kever Yang]

Hi Lee Jones,


On 2022/6/27 16:39, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>> Functions pointed to by this op pointer can return non-zero values
>> indicating an error.  Ensure any error value is propagated back up the
>> call-chain.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> Weekly check-in:
>
> Are these still on someone's radar, or would you like me to [RESEND]?

It would be better to add leading message "rockchip:" in the subject.


Thanks,

- Kever

>> diff --git a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c
>> index c0a06dcaed..0af0fa9e7b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ram/rockchip/sdram_rk3399.c
>> @@ -3005,7 +3005,9 @@ static int sdram_init(struct dram_info *dram,
>>   	params->base.stride = calculate_stride(params);
>>   	dram_all_config(dram, params);
>>   
>> -	dram->ops->set_rate_index(dram, params);
>> +	ret = dram->ops->set_rate_index(dram, params);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>>   
>>   	debug("Finish SDRAM initialization...\n");
>>   	return 0;