[PATCH v3 9/9] board: qualcomm: Add support for QCS404 EVB
Sumit Garg
sumit.garg at linaro.org
Thu Jul 14 09:40:45 CEST 2022
Hi Stephan,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 01:02, Stephan Gerhold <stephan at gerhold.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:42:12PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Add support for Qualcomm QCS404 SoC based evaluation board.
> >
> > Features:
> > - Qualcomm Snapdragon QCS404 SoC
> > - 1GiB RAM
> > - 8GiB eMMC, uSD slot
> >
> > U-boot is chain loaded by ABL in 64-bit mode as part of boot.img.
> > For detailed build and boot instructions, refer to
> > doc/board/qualcomm/qcs404.rst.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> > arch/arm/dts/qcs404-evb-uboot.dtsi | 24 +++++++
> > arch/arm/dts/qcs404-evb.dts | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-snapdragon/Kconfig | 11 ++++
> > arch/arm/mach-snapdragon/Makefile | 2 +
> > arch/arm/mach-snapdragon/sysmap-qcs404.c | 31 +++++++++
> > board/qualcomm/qcs404-evb/Kconfig | 15 +++++
> > board/qualcomm/qcs404-evb/MAINTAINERS | 6 ++
> > board/qualcomm/qcs404-evb/Makefile | 6 ++
> > board/qualcomm/qcs404-evb/qcs404-evb.c | 33 ++++++++++
> > board/qualcomm/qcs404-evb/qcs404-evb.its | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
> > configs/qcs404evb_defconfig | 39 ++++++++++++
> > doc/board/qualcomm/index.rst | 1 +
> > doc/board/qualcomm/qcs404.rst | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/configs/qcs404-evb.h | 27 ++++++++
> > 15 files changed, 420 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/qcs404-evb-uboot.dtsi
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/qcs404-evb.dts
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-snapdragon/sysmap-qcs404.c
> > create mode 100644 board/qualcomm/qcs404-evb/Kconfig
> > create mode 100644 board/qualcomm/qcs404-evb/MAINTAINERS
> > create mode 100644 board/qualcomm/qcs404-evb/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 board/qualcomm/qcs404-evb/qcs404-evb.c
> > create mode 100644 board/qualcomm/qcs404-evb/qcs404-evb.its
> > create mode 100644 configs/qcs404evb_defconfig
> > create mode 100644 doc/board/qualcomm/qcs404.rst
> > create mode 100644 include/configs/qcs404-evb.h
> >
> > [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/qcs404-evb.dts b/arch/arm/dts/qcs404-evb.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..4f0ae20bdb
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/qcs404-evb.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> > +/*
> > + * Qualcomm QCS404 based evaluation board device tree source
> > + *
> > + * (C) Copyright 2022 Sumit Garg <sumit.garg at linaro.org>
> > + */
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +#include "skeleton64.dtsi"
> > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-snapdragon.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-qcs404.h>
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. QCS404 EVB";
> > + compatible = "qcom,qcs404-evb", "qcom,qcs404";
> > + #address-cells = <0x2>;
> > + #size-cells = <0x2>;
> > +
> > + chosen {
> > + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> > + };
> > +
> > + aliases {
> > + serial0 = &debug_uart;
> > + };
> > +
> > + memory {
> > + device_type = "memory";
> > + reg = <0 0x80000000 0 0x40000000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + soc {
> > + #address-cells = <0x1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0x1>;
> > + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xffffffff>;
> > + compatible = "simple-bus";
> > +
> > + pinctrl_north at 1300000 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,tlmm-qcs404";
> > + reg = <0x1300000 0x200000>;
> > +
> > + blsp1_uart2: uart {
> > + pins = "GPIO_17", "GPIO_18";
> > + function = "blsp_uart2";
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
>
> I know you're just following the example of the existing Qualcomm boards
> here but I think we should really avoid adding any more custom device
> trees that are inconsistent with the official (upstream) Linux bindings.
>
> Many other boards in U-Boot have moved to using the upstream Linux DTs
> as-is (with some additions in -u-boot.dtsi) and I think we should do the
> same for the Qualcomm boards. Judging from Tom's comments on other
> patches (e.g. [1]), this might even be a requirement now?
>
I overall agree with this and you can already see patches #2 and #3 in
this patch-set following this guideline.
> The SPMI fix I just sent for DB410c/DB820c [2] is a good example why it
> is important to have bindings consistent with Linux. Looking at your
> patch reminded me that I never sent this fix (thanks!).
>
Makes sense and I can echo with this while adding new boards support
its difficult to cope up with different DT expectations from Linux and
u-boot drivers.
> Can you check how hard it would be to reuse the upstream QCS404 DT?
>
It turned out to be patch [1] on top of this patch-set. Please help me
to test it on boards you have access to.
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220714073337.2298978-1-sumit.garg@linaro.org/
-Sumit
> Thanks!
> Stephan
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20220601152800.GJ25375@bill-the-cat/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20220713191711.4155-1-stephan@gerhold.net/
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list