[PATCH v3] board: freescale: p1_p2_rdb_pc: Fix parsing inverted bits from boot input data

[Pali Rohár]

On Friday 08 July 2022 19:10:26 Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2022 at 12:49:27AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > PING?
> > 
> > How many times you would ask me to again rebase this patch??
> > 
> > On Sunday 03 July 2022 14:39:13 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > On Thursday 23 June 2022 15:04:08 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 16 June 2022 14:37:07 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > > On some boards upper 4 bits of i2c boot input data (register 0) are
> > > > > inverted. Information which bits are inverted is stored in register 2.
> > > > > 
> > > > > So invert read input data back according to register 2 prior processing
> > > > > them. This fixes printing "rom_loc: value" line during booting.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali at kernel.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Changes in v3:
> > > > > * Rebased on top of the U-Boot next branch, commit a87a6fcd20c0e29fe55bfbb6917c4aa1f1bbce74
> > > > 
> > > > PING?
> > > 
> > > PING?
> > > 
> > > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > > * Use register 2 for detecting which bits needs to be inverted
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/p1_p2_rdb_pc.c | 6 ++++--
> > > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/p1_p2_rdb_pc.c b/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/p1_p2_rdb_pc.c
> > > > > index 6665aa4ba94e..d36306f35427 100644
> > > > > --- a/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/p1_p2_rdb_pc.c
> > > > > +++ b/board/freescale/p1_p2_rdb_pc/p1_p2_rdb_pc.c
> > > > > @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ int checkboard(void)
> > > > >  {
> > > > >  	struct cpld_data *cpld_data = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_CPLD_BASE);
> > > > >  	ccsr_gur_t *gur = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_GUTS_ADDR);
> > > > > -	u8 in, out, io_config, val;
> > > > > +	u8 in, out, invert, io_config, val;
> > > > >  	int bus_num = CONFIG_SYS_SPD_BUS_NUM;
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	/* FIXME: This should just use the model from the device tree or similar */
> > > > > @@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ int checkboard(void)
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	if (dm_i2c_read(dev, 0, &in, 1) < 0 ||
> > > > >  	    dm_i2c_read(dev, 1, &out, 1) < 0 ||
> > > > > +	    dm_i2c_read(dev, 2, &invert, 1) < 0 ||
> > > > >  	    dm_i2c_read(dev, 3, &io_config, 1) < 0) {
> > > > >  		printf("Error reading i2c boot information!\n");
> > > > >  		return 0; /* Don't want to hang() on this error */
> > > > > @@ -207,13 +208,14 @@ int checkboard(void)
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	if (i2c_read(CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA9557_ADDR, 0, 1, &in, 1) < 0 ||
> > > > >  	    i2c_read(CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA9557_ADDR, 1, 1, &out, 1) < 0 ||
> > > > > +	    i2c_read(CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA9557_ADDR, 2, 1, &invert, 1) < 0 ||
> > > > >  	    i2c_read(CONFIG_SYS_I2C_PCA9557_ADDR, 3, 1, &io_config, 1) < 0) {
> > > > >  		printf("Error reading i2c boot information!\n");
> > > > >  		return 0; /* Don't want to hang() on this error */
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  	#endif
> > > > >  
> > > > > -	val = (in & io_config) | (out & (~io_config));
> > > > > +	val = ((in ^ invert) & io_config) | (out & (~io_config));
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	puts("rom_loc: ");
> > > > >  	if ((val & (~__SW_BOOT_MASK)) == __SW_BOOT_SD) {
> 
> Peng, this patch doesn't apply currently but also looks fairly obvious
> to adapt to top of tree.  Please just make it apply when you pick this
> up, thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Tom

June 16 I got message that this patch does not apply:
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/8d8a6be1-6033-5771-0e0e-f51de1488e69@oss.nxp.com/

Just few hours later I sent rebased patch which applied cleanly:
https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20220616123707.8562-1-pali@kernel.org/

And since June 16 I have not received any reply.

Guys, why you are asking me for rebasing patches and then you do not
care about them and wait until they do not apply again?

I was asked to remind pending patches -- I have did it more times and I
got absolutely no response. Now is July 23.