[PATCH v5 1/4] timer: atmel_tcb_timer: add atmel_tcb driver

Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com
Mon Mar 7 11:57:02 CET 2022


On 04.03.2022 13:05, Clément Léger wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> Add a driver for the timer counter block that can be found on sama5d2.
> This driver will be used when booting under OP-TEE since the pit timer
> which is part of the SYSC is secured. Channel 1 & 2 are configured to
> be chained together which allows to have a 64bits counter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger at bootlin.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                     |   1 +
>  drivers/timer/Kconfig           |   8 ++
>  drivers/timer/Makefile          |   1 +
>  drivers/timer/atmel_tcb_timer.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 165 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/timer/atmel_tcb_timer.c
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 0f39bc6bc9..e30389dc3e 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ F:  arch/arm/mach-at91/
>  F:     board/atmel/
>  F:     drivers/cpu/at91_cpu.c
>  F:     drivers/misc/microchip_flexcom.c
> +F:     drivers/timer/atmel_tcb_timer.c
>  F:     include/dt-bindings/mfd/atmel-flexcom.h
>  F:     drivers/timer/mchp-pit64b-timer.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/timer/Kconfig b/drivers/timer/Kconfig
> index 8913142654..8fad59b81a 100644
> --- a/drivers/timer/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/timer/Kconfig
> @@ -96,6 +96,14 @@ config ATMEL_PIT_TIMER
>           it is designed to offer maximum accuracy and efficient management,
>           even for systems with long response time.
> 
> +config ATMEL_TCB_TIMER
> +       bool "Atmel timer counter support"
> +       depends on TIMER
> +       depends on ARCH_AT91
> +       help
> +         Select this to enable the use of the timer counter as a monotonic
> +         counter.
> +
>  config CADENCE_TTC_TIMER
>         bool "Cadence TTC (Triple Timer Counter)"
>         depends on TIMER
> diff --git a/drivers/timer/Makefile b/drivers/timer/Makefile
> index e2bd530eb0..58da6c1e84 100644
> --- a/drivers/timer/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/timer/Makefile
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARC_TIMER)       += arc_timer.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_AST_TIMER)        += ast_timer.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ATCPIT100_TIMER) += atcpit100_timer.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ATMEL_PIT_TIMER) += atmel_pit_timer.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ATMEL_TCB_TIMER) += atmel_tcb_timer.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CADENCE_TTC_TIMER)        += cadence-ttc.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DESIGNWARE_APB_TIMER)     += dw-apb-timer.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MPC83XX_TIMER) += mpc83xx_timer.o
> diff --git a/drivers/timer/atmel_tcb_timer.c b/drivers/timer/atmel_tcb_timer.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..b73b367227
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/timer/atmel_tcb_timer.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Microchip Corporation
> + *
> + * Author: Clément Léger <clement.leger at bootlin.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <common.h>
> +#include <clk.h>
> +#include <dm.h>
> +#include <timer.h>
> +#include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +
> +#define TCB_CHAN(chan)         ((chan) * 0x40)
> +
> +#define TCB_CCR(chan)          (0x0 + TCB_CHAN(chan))
> +#define  TCB_CCR_SWTRG         0x4

This is not used

> +#define  TCB_CCR_CLKEN         0x1

Here

> +
> +#define TCB_CMR(chan)          (0x4 + TCB_CHAN(chan))
> +#define  TCB_CMR_WAVE          BIT(15)

here

> +#define  TCB_CMR_TIMER_CLOCK0  0

Datasheet names it CLOCK1.

> +#define  TCB_CMR_XC1           6
> +#define  TCB_CMR_ACPA_SET      BIT(16)

here

> +#define  TCB_CMR_ACPC_CLEAR    (2 << 18)
> +
> +#define TCB_CV(chan)           (0x10 + TCB_CHAN(chan))
> +
> +#define TCB_RA(chan)           (0x14 + TCB_CHAN(chan))
> +#define TCB_RC(chan)           (0x1c + TCB_CHAN(chan))
> +
> +#define TCB_IDR(chan)          (0x28 + TCB_CHAN(chan))
> +
> +#define TCB_BCR                        0xc0
> +#define  TCB_BCR_SYNC          0x1

and here: there a mixture of using BIT() and using plain bit defines: would
be good to stick to one or the other.

> +
> +#define TCB_BMR                        0xc4
> +#define  TCB_BMR_TC1XC1S_TIOA0 (2 << 2)
> +
> +#define TCB_WPMR               0xe4
> +#define  TCB_WPMR_WAKEY                0x54494d
> +
> +struct atmel_tcb_plat {
> +       void __iomem *base;
> +};
> +
> +static u64 atmel_tcb_get_count(struct udevice *dev)
> +{
> +       struct atmel_tcb_plat *plat = dev_get_plat(dev);
> +       u64 cv0 = 0;
> +       u64 cv1 = 0;
> +
> +       do {
> +               cv1 = readl(plat->base + TCB_CV(1));
> +               cv0 = readl(plat->base + TCB_CV(0));
> +       } while (readl(plat->base + TCB_CV(1)) != cv1);
> +
> +       cv0 |= cv1 << 32;
> +
> +       return cv0;
> +}
> +
> +static void atmel_tcb_configure(void __iomem *base)
> +{
> +       /* Disable write protection */
> +       writel(TCB_WPMR_WAKEY, base + TCB_WPMR);
> +
> +       /* Disable all irqs for both channel 0 & 1 */
> +       writel(0xff, base + TCB_IDR(0));
> +       writel(0xff, base + TCB_IDR(1));
> +
> +       /*
> +        * In order to avoid wrapping, use a 64 bit counter by chaining
> +        * two channels.
> +        * Channel 0 is configured to generate a clock on TIOA0 which is cleared
> +        * when reaching 0x80000000 and set when reaching 0.
> +        */
> +       writel(TCB_CMR_TIMER_CLOCK0 | TCB_CMR_WAVE | TCB_CMR_ACPA_SET
> +                  | TCB_CMR_ACPC_CLEAR, base + TCB_CMR(0));
> +       writel(0x80000000, base + TCB_RC(0));
> +       writel(0x1, base + TCB_RA(0));

I see this set to zero in Linux. Is it set to 1 to avoid "set when reaching
0" described above?

> +       writel(TCB_CCR_CLKEN, base + TCB_CCR(0));
> +
> +       /* Channel 1 is configured to use TIOA0 as input */
> +       writel(TCB_CMR_XC1 | TCB_CMR_WAVE, base + TCB_CMR(1));
> +       writel(TCB_CCR_CLKEN, base + TCB_CCR(1));
> +
> +       /* Set XC1 input to be TIOA0 (ie output of Channel 0) */
> +       writel(TCB_BMR_TC1XC1S_TIOA0, base + TCB_BMR);
> +
> +       /* Sync & start all timers */
> +       writel(TCB_BCR_SYNC, base + TCB_BCR);
> +}
> +
> +static int atmel_tcb_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> +{
> +       struct atmel_tcb_plat *plat = dev_get_plat(dev);
> +       struct timer_dev_priv *uc_priv = dev_get_uclass_priv(dev);
> +       struct clk clk;
> +       ulong clk_rate;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       if (!device_is_compatible(dev->parent, "atmel,sama5d2-tcb"))

Is this necessary?

> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       /* Currently, we only support channel 0 and 1 to be chained */
> +       if (dev_read_addr_index(dev, 0) != 0 &&
> +           dev_read_addr_index(dev, 1) != 1) {
> +               printf("Error: only chained timers 0 and 1 are supported\n");
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       ret = clk_get_by_name(dev->parent, "gclk", &clk);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       clk_rate = clk_get_rate(&clk);
> +       if (!clk_rate)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       uc_priv->clock_rate = clk_rate;
> +
> +       atmel_tcb_configure(plat->base);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int atmel_tcb_of_to_plat(struct udevice *dev)
> +{
> +       struct atmel_tcb_plat *plat = dev_get_plat(dev);
> +
> +       plat->base = dev_read_addr_ptr(dev->parent);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct timer_ops atmel_tcb_ops = {
> +       .get_count = atmel_tcb_get_count,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct udevice_id atmel_tcb_ids[] = {
> +       { .compatible = "atmel,tcb-timer" },
> +       { }
> +};
> +
> +U_BOOT_DRIVER(atmel_tcb) = {
> +       .name = "atmel_tcb",
> +       .id = UCLASS_TIMER,
> +       .of_match = atmel_tcb_ids,
> +       .of_to_plat = atmel_tcb_of_to_plat,
> +       .plat_auto = sizeof(struct atmel_tcb_plat),
> +       .probe = atmel_tcb_probe,
> +       .ops = &atmel_tcb_ops,
> +};
> --
> 2.34.1
> 



More information about the U-Boot mailing list