[PATCH 1/3] power: Rename CONFIG_POWER_TPS65217 with CONFIG_PMIC_TPS65217

[Lukasz Majewski]

Hi Tom,

> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 01:09:08PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >   
> > > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 09:03:58AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:  
> > > > Up till now the CONFIG_POWER_TPS65217 has been defined in
> > > > several header files for am335x SoC.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch renames it to CONFIG_PMIC_TPS65217, which better
> > > > reflects the role of this IC circuit.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma at denx.de>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung at samsung.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > >  drivers/power/pmic/Makefile         | 2 +-
> > > >  include/configs/am335x_evm.h        | 2 +-
> > > >  include/configs/am335x_guardian.h   | 2 +-
> > > >  include/configs/am335x_shc.h        | 2 +-
> > > >  include/configs/am335x_sl50.h       | 2 +-
> > > >  include/configs/brppt1.h            | 2 +-
> > > >  include/configs/bur_am335x_common.h | 2 +-
> > > >  include/configs/chiliboard.h        | 2 +-
> > > >  scripts/config_whitelist.txt        | 2 +-
> > > >  9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)    
> > > 
> > > This needs to be migrated to Kconfig fully / correctly as well,
> > > not just changing the whitelist entry.
> > >   
> > 
> > But there is follow up patch, which adds proper entry to Kconfig
> > with new name:
> > 
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220222080401.6859-2-lukma@denx.de/
> > 
> > The idea was to first rename the CONFIG_POWER_TPS65217 to
> > CONFIG_PMIC_TPS65217 (as a single patch) and then provide DM support
> > for TPS65217 with proper (renamed) Kconfig entry.  
> 
> Please re-order the series so we don't do what you're doing here and
> be sure to fully migrate everyone.  I noticed this as part of finding
> and fixing:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220311121248.2801589-1-trini@konsulko.com/
> yesterday and saw a bunch of PMIC symbols get listed.
> 

I can squash those two patches:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220222080401.6859-1-lukma@denx.de/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220222080401.6859-2-lukma@denx.de/

However, the drawback is that we would have the move to Kconfig type of
patch with the rename.

Would it be OK?


Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

--

DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma at denx.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20220311/3a321a8b/attachment.sig>