[PATCH 2/2] board: tbs2910: Convert to DM_SERIAL

[Simon Glass]

Hi Soeren,

On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 13:22, Soeren Moch <smoch at web.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 14.03.22 19:28, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 12:24:36PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> >> Hi Soeren,
> >>
> >> On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 02:26, Soeren Moch <smoch at web.de> wrote:
> >>> ... to get rid of the build warning.
> >>> Unfortunately we still need the board specific serial pin init code.
> >>> Otherwise the first boot messages over the serial console are lost.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Soeren Moch <smoch at web.de>
> >>> ---
> >>> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic at denx.de>
> >>> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com>
> >>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini at konsulko.com>
> >>> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org>
> >>> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >>>
> >>> The whole purpose of DM is somewhat defeated when we still need board
> >>> specific initializations. Any ideas how we can get all boot messages
> >>> without board specific inits? 'u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;' in the uart device
> >>> tree node did not help.
> >> You can put that in your serial driver, perhaps? Or in the initial SoC
> >> init code?
> Why should I do so? The whole point of DM is initializing devices from
> DT. And when I wish to do so pre-relocation, it is advertised in DM to
> add 'u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;' for this purpose. I tried, it did not work.
> And this is nothing closely related to the serial driver itself, I just
> want the pin setup running pre-relocation and not as late as it is
> running now under DM_SERIAL.

If you have a pinctrl driver it will be used. I don't really
understand your problem.

>
> I also do not want to run this pin setup twice (first in board or SoC
> code and again by DM_SERIAL later). Maybe I miss something obvious, but
> duplication of the setup code cannot be a proper solution.

Well the pinctrl will be triggered before relocation and after, if
enabled. We could solve that but have not tried.

> >>
> >> Another recent way (in -next) is to use events to monitor the
> >> EVT_DM_PRE_PROBE event for the serial driver.
> I can monitor the probe event, OK. But how can this solve my problem?
> Again, maybe I miss something obvious, please tell me when I do so.
> > It's just the same thing every single imx platform is doing.
> >
> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean here. The reference platform for
> my board is mx6sabresd. This is not converted to DM_SERIAL yet. Most (?)
> imx boards use SPL, pin setup is different there.
> I looked into imx boards with DM_SERIAL. They either removed the
> board-specific setup code (which results in missing early boot messages:
> u-boot version, board name, DDR size, ...) or they are playing tricks in
> SPL (not the clean and easy solution that DM promises). Maybe I missed a
> better reference for the DM_SERIAL conversion without SPL. Can you point
> me to such board?

If you want to use pinctrl in SPL, you can do all of this cleanly. If
you have code-size constraints, then you may want to do something like
rockchip, where only specific peripherals are supported in pinctrl in
SPL.

You could look at firefly-rk3288 (or bob/coral/jerry) which I believe
is done fully with driver model.

Perhaps Tom has a better handle on the problem.

Regards,
Simon