[GIT PULL] please pull fsl-qoriq-2022-9-7

[Peng Fan]

On 9/8/2022 1:55 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2022 at 12:38:10PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> Please pull fsl-qoriq-2022-9-7
>>
>> Sorry for the quick rush just after fsl-qoriq-2022-9-6:
>>   Pali's patch not in my patchwork, got missed.
>>   Sean's patch pending for sometime, I just fix conflict when
>>   apply Sean's patch, so pick up.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------
>> p1_p2_rdb_pc board update
>> net: fm: Verify Fman microcode
>> ---------------------------------------
>>
>> CI: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-fsl-qoriq/-/pipelines/13377
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Peng.
>>
>> The following changes since commit 59c51fa4abbca41d2a4d60c0fe4d8f05fc83fb46:
>>
>>    Merge https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv (2022-09-06 09:01:39 -0400)
>>
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>>    https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-fsl-qoriq.git tags/fsl-qoriq-2022-9-7
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 857e313a3d44618e09fc64816fd5e561e2189ab7:
>>
>>    net: fm: Add support for FIT firmware (2022-09-07 13:44:55 +0800)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Pali Rohár (3):
>>        board: freescale: p1_p2_rdb_pc: Add env commands norlowerboot, norupperboot, sd2boot and defboot
>>        board: freescale: p1_p2_rdb_pc: Delete watchdog max6370 node in load_default mode
>>        board: freescale: p1_p2_rdb_pc: Calculate offsets for eSDHC boot sector
>>
>> Sean Anderson (6):
>>        ARMv8/sec_firmware: Remove SEC_FIRMWARE_FIT_CNF_NAME
>>        image: fit: Add some helpers for getting data
>>        ARMv8/sec_firmware: Convert to use fit_get_data_conf_prop
>>        cmd: fpga: Convert to use fit_get_data_node
>>        net: Convert fit verification to use fit_get_data_*
>>        net: fm: Add support for FIT firmware
> 
> First, I've applied this now to u-boot/master.
> 
> But second, the reason Pali's patches were assigned to someone else,
> Marek, was because of the total lack of response these last several
> months. Marek was added for the subset of PowerPC platforms that he and
> Pali have an interest in, which is all around the Turris 1.x router
> platform.
> 
> So, what do you think about how to proceed here moving forward? A large
> number of Pali's changes have been waiting to be picked up / reviewed
> for a very long time, is why we've added Marek, to cover the Turris
> platform.

If the delay was caused by me, sorry for that. I could ramp up more
time in maintainer work.

Pali,

I am ok if Turris patches go through Marek's tree. or you wanna me to
pick up those patches, please help assign those patches. If bug fix,
I could prepare PR to master branch, if new feature, we could consider 
PR for next branch.

Thanks,
Peng.

>